Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30439954›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Patterning the insect eye: From stochastic to deterministic mechanisms.

Haleh Ebadi, Michael Perry, Keith Short, Konstantin Klemm, Claude Desplan, Peter F Stadler, Anita Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Deep conservation complemented by novelty and innovation in the insect eye ground plan.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole genome sequence of a long-legged flyFrontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Horsefly object-directed polarotaxis is mediated by a stochastically distributed ommatidial subtype in the ventral retina.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Haleh EbadiBioinformatics, Institute for Computer Science, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael PerryDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Keith ShortDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Konstantin KlemmDepartment of Computer Science, School of Science and Technology, Nazarbayev University, Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan.
Claude DesplanDepartment of Biology, New York University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Peter F StadlerBioinformatics, Institute for Computer Science, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-5191
Anita MehtaMax Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, Germany.
New York University · USInstitute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems · ESLeipzig University · DEMax Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences · DESanta Fe Institute · US

Funding

Stochastic choices in the retina and optic lobesR01EY013010 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI DESPLAN, CLAUDE · 1999 to 2025
$9.1M
Bridging the gap between transcriptional activation and cell fate specification in the Drosophila visual systemK99EY027016 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PERRY, MICHAEL WILLIAM · 2016 to 2017
$272k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY027016NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While most processes in biology are highly deterministic, stochastic mechanisms are sometimes used to increase cellular diversity. In human and Drosophila eyes, photoreceptors sensitive to different wavelengths of light are distributed in stochastic patterns, and one such patterning system has been analyzed in detail in the Drosophila retina. Interestingly, some species in the dipteran family Dolichopodidae (the "long legged" flies, or "Doli") instead exhibit highly orderly deterministic eye patterns. In these species, alternating columns of ommatidia (unit eyes) produce corneal lenses of different colors. Occasional perturbations in some individuals disrupt the regular columns in a way that suggests that patterning occurs via a posterior-to-anterior signaling relay during development, and that specification follows a local, cellular-automaton-like rule. We hypothesize that the regulatory mechanisms that pattern the eye are largely conserved among flies and that the difference between unordered Drosophila and ordered dolichopodid eyes can be explained in terms of relative strengths of signaling interactions rather than a rewiring of the regulatory network itself. We present a simple stochastic model that is capable of explaining both the stochastic Drosophila eye and the striped pattern of Dolichopodidae eyes and thereby characterize the least number of underlying developmental rules necessary to produce both stochastic and deterministic patterns. We show that only small changes to model parameters are needed to also reproduce intermediate, semi-random patterns observed in another Doli species, and quantification of ommatidial distributions in these eyes suggests that their patterning follows similar rules.

Indexed as

Body PatterningAnimalsDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEyeModels, TheoreticalPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateProbabilityStochastic ProcessesDrosophila Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30439954
PMCPMC6264902
OpenAlexW2606995739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.