ReviewMedicine2018
Ureteral inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: A case report and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the genitourinary tract: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Extramedullary plasmacytoma of the ureter.IJU case reports · 2022Article
- Kidney inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor masquerading as metastatic malignancy: A case report and literature review.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleInflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare soft-tissue neoplasm which has been described in a variety of locations. In the urogenital system, IMT predominantly occurs in the bladder and the kidney. IMT arising from the ureter is exceedingly rare and has been sporadically reported before. PATIENT CONCERNS: We reported an extremely exceptional case of IMT arising from the ureteral submucosa in a 54-year-old man. The patient was hospitalized with the main complaint of intermittent and moderate left abdominal pain for 2 months. DIAGNOSES AND
interventionsComputed tomography scan revealed a nearly circular mass in the left upper ureter. Ureteroscopy showed that the ureteral lumen mucosa was smooth. However, the upper ureter was compressed and narrow. Renal dynamic imaging was performed and the measured glomerular filtration rate was 46.98 mL/min (right renal) and 9.77 mL/min (left renal), respectively. A retroperitoneoscopic radical nephroureterectomy was performed. The histopathologic examination revealed that the soft-tissue neoplasm was mainly composed of myofibroblastic spindle cells proliferation with mixed inflammatory infiltrate, containing lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils. On immunohistochemical staining, the tumor was positive for smooth muscle actin and Ki-67 (<1%+), indicating a confirmed diagnosis of ureteral IMT. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered well with no occurrence of complications. At 3-year follow-up, there was no radiologic evidence of tumor recurrence or metastasis and the man was well. LESSONS: Ureteral IMT is extremely rare and often asymptomatic, resulting in delayed diagnosis. Radiologic evidences may be suggestive of the diagnosis of IMT. However, it is necessary to make an accurate diagnosis in terms of histopathologic assessment. Complete lesion excision is the best therapeutic approach with rare recurrences and excellent survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.