Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30431589›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Dexmedetomidine combined with local anesthetics in thoracic paravertebral block: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Kai Wang, Li-Jun Wang, Tong-Jiu Yang, Qing-Xiang Mao, Zhen Wang, Li-Yong Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Surgery With Peripheral Nerve Block Under Dexmedetomidine Sedation for Foot Ulcer.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kai WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Institute of Surgery Research, the Army Medical University, Chongqing.
Li-Jun WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Institute of Surgery Research, the Army Medical University, Chongqing.
Tong-Jiu YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Institute of Surgery Research, the Army Medical University, Chongqing.
Qing-Xiang MaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Institute of Surgery Research, the Army Medical University, Chongqing.
Zhen WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Institute of Surgery Research, the Army Medical University, Chongqing.
Li-Yong ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Daping Hospital, Institute of Surgery Research, the Army Medical University, Chongqing.
Army Medical University · CNDaping Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDexmedetomidine (DEX) improves postoperative pain scores and prolongs the duration of blockage when combined with local anesthetics (LAs) for neuraxial and brachial plexus block; however, there is little information about the effectiveness of DEX as an adjuvant to LAs in paravertebral block (PVB). Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DEX combined with LAs in PVB.

methodAn electronic database search from inception date to February 2018 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DEX as an adjuvant to LAs with LAs alone for PVB in adult patients were included. Postoperative pain scores, duration of analgesia, cumulative perioperative analgesic consumption, and adverse events were analyzed.

resultWe identified 7 trials enrolling 350 patients and found that DEX reduced pain scores at rest by standardized mean differences (SMD) -0.86 cm (95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.55, -0.17], P = .01) and SMD -0.93 cm (95% CI [-1.41, -0.26], P =.008) at postoperative 12 hours and 24 hours, respectively. DEX reduced pain scores while dynamic by SMD -1.63 cm (95% CI [-2.92, -0.34], P =.01) and SMD -1.78 cm (95% CI [-2.66, -0.90], P =.007) for postoperative 12 hours and 24 hours, respectively. DEX extended the duration of analgesia by weighted mean differences (WMD) 201.53 minutes (95% CI [33.45, 369.61], P =.02); and reduced cumulative postoperative analgesic consumption by WMD -7.71 mg (95% CI [-10.64, -4.78], P <.001) and WMD -45.64 mg (95% CI [-69.76, -21.53], P < .001) for 24 hours morphine and 48 hours tramadol subgroups, respectively. DEX also increased the odds of hypotension by odds ratio (OR) 4.40 (95% CI [1.37, 14.17], P = .01); however, there was no statistically significant difference for intraoperative fentanyl consumption and the incidence of the bradycardia.

conclusionsDEX combined with LAs in PVB significantly improved postoperative pain scores, prolonged the duration of analgesia, reduced postoperative analgesic consumption, and increased the odds of hypotension. However, we cannot neglect the heterogeneity of the included RCTs. More large-scale prospective studies are needed to further clarify the above conclusions. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42018090251.

Indexed as

Analgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthetics, LocalBrachial Plexus BlockDexmedetomidineHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnesthetics, LocalDexmedetomidine

Identifiers

PMID30431589
PMCPMC6257417
OpenAlexW2901162636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.