Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30431576›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

The relation of passive smoking with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Benyu Su, Wen Qin, Feng Xue, Xiaomin Wei, Qiangdong Guan, Wenchong Jiang, Shue Wang, Mengmeng Xu, Sufang Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antibiotic adoption effects on nutrition and quality of life in lung cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy: A meta-analysis.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Environmental Risk Factors and Health: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Risk-Reducing Measures for Cancer Prevention.Korean journal of family medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benyu SuSchool of Public Health, Shandong University.
Wen QinHospital of Shandong University, Jinan.
Feng XueDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Heze Municipal Hospital, Heze.
Xiaomin WeiDepartment of Out-patient, Department of Public Health, Jinan Central Hospital, Jinan, PR China.
Qiangdong GuanSchool of Public Health, Shandong University.
Wenchong JiangSchool of Public Health, Shandong University.
Shue WangSchool of Public Health, Shandong University.
Mengmeng XuSchool of Public Health, Shandong University.
Sufang YuSchool of Public Health, Shandong University.
Shandong University · CNHeze Municipal Hospital · CNJinan Central Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublished studies about passive smoking and cervical cancer have found inconsistent results. Hence, the present meta-analysis was performed to assess this association.

methodsA systematical search was performed to identify eligible cohort and case-control studies in PubMed, Scopus, Elsevier ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases (up to March, 2018). The quality of included studies was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa quality scale (NOS). The random effects model (REM) was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (ORs). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Publication bias was assessed by funnel plot, using Begg's test and Egger's test.

resultsAround 14 eligible studies were included for analysis, which included a total of 384,995 participants. The pooled ORs of passive smoking with cervical cancer risk was 1.70 (95% CI: 1.40-2.07, I = 64.3%). Subgroups stratified by continent, study design, quality score, and cervical cancer types/phases suggested that the result was robust. For instance, the pooled ORs for the cohort and case-control studies was 1.37 (95% CI: 1.16-1.62, I = 0%) and 2.09 (95% CI: 1.52-2.89, I = 76.6%), respectively. The pooled ORs ranged from 1.61 (95%CI: 1.34-1.92) to 1.77 (95%CI: 1.44-2.16) after one study was removed each time in the sensitivity analyses, indicating that the result was stable. Publication bias was detected by funnel plot and Egger's tests. The recalculated ORs were 1.33 (95% CI: 1.21-1.47).

conclusionsThis meta-analysis provides evidence that passive smoking is associated with an increased risk of cervical cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioRisk FactorsTobacco Smoke PollutionUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID30431576
PMCPMC6257541
OpenAlexW2923768693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.