Trial reportMedicine2018
Ambulation capacity and functional outcome in patients undergoing neuromuscular electrical stimulation after cardiac valve surgery: A randomised clinical trial.
Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Korean clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation in critically ill patients and post-intensive care syndrome.Acute and critical care · 2026Guideline
- Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for early rehabilitation in critically ill patients: a systematic review of applied protocols.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Pooled it
- The effect of electrical stimulation in critical patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Pooled it
- The effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hospitalised adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Age and ageing · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for thoracic and abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Early Mobilization Prescription in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Therapeutic Potential of Electromyostimulation (EMS) in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Pooled it
- Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Preoperative exercise and recovery after cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Prehabilitation in Cardiovascular Surgery: The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation (Randomized Clinical Trial).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients and Post-Intensive Care Syndrome.Annals of rehabilitation medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Muscle Proteolysis, Muscle Mass and Strength, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Functional Activity, and Quality of Life in Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Narrative Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Review
- Safety and effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in cardiac surgery: A systematic review.World journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients 2023 (J-ReCIP 2023).Journal of intensive care · 2023Review
- Cognitive outcomes in patients treated with neuromuscular electrical stimulation after coronary artery bypass grafting.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Impact of early mobilization on clinical and functional outcomes in patients submitted to coronary artery bypass grafting.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly mobilization and physical exercise are considered fundamental components in cardiovascular surgery rehabilitation; however, occasionally they are inadequate for inhibiting functional decline. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a promising tool in cardiovascular rehabilitation; however, to date, no randomized clinical trial has measured the effects of NMES on functional capacity and quality of life in patients who undergo routine cardiac surgery with a short intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of NMES on walking ability, muscle strength, functional independence, and quality of life in cardiac valve surgery patients in the immediate postoperative period.
methodsA randomized, parallel, controlled, 2-arm clinical trial with assessor blinding was conducted. Fifty-nine adult patients in the preoperative period after cardiac valve reconstruction and/or replacement were randomly assigned to a control or intervention group. The intervention group underwent NMES in the quadriceps and gastrocnemius, bilaterally, for 60 minutes, for up to 10 sessions. The primary outcome was ambulation ability, assessed through the Six-Minute Walk Test and Walking Speed Test at postoperative day 5 (5PO). Secondary outcomes were muscular strength (assessed through the Medical Research Council scale), functional independence measure (assessed through the Functional Independence Measurement Questionnaire), and quality of life (assessed through the Nottingham Health Profile) at baseline (preoperative) and at postoperative days 3 and 5.
resultsThe baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, except for body mass index. There was no statistically significant difference, with a small effect size, between both groups regarding the distance walked (95% CI, -64.87 to 65.97) and walking speed (95% CI, -0.55 to 0.57). There was a statistically significant difference in upper-limb muscle strength loss and decline in mobility at postoperative day 3, which had a tendency to recover to initial values at 5PO, in both groups. No significant between-group difference was noted for muscle strength, functional independence, and quality of life.
conclusionsThe use of NMES had no effect on walking ability, strength, quality of life, or functional outcome in the postoperative period for patients that underwent regular valve replacement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.