Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30431575›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2018

Ambulation capacity and functional outcome in patients undergoing neuromuscular electrical stimulation after cardiac valve surgery: A randomised clinical trial.

Telma Cristina Fontes Cerqueira, Manoel Luiz de Cerqueira Neto, Lucas de Assis Pereira Cacau, Géssica Uruga Oliveira, Walderi Monteiro da Silva Júnior, Vitor Oliveira Carvalho, José Teles de Mendonça, Valter Joviniano de Santana Filho

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults after heart valve surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Telma Cristina Fontes CerqueiraDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Lagarto.
Manoel Luiz de Cerqueira NetoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São, Cristóvão.
Lucas de Assis Pereira CacauDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Tiradentes, Aracaju.
Géssica Uruga OliveiraUniversidade Federal de Sergipe, Aracaju.
Walderi Monteiro da Silva JúniorDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão; Hospital Universitário de Sergipe, Aracaju.
Vitor Oliveira CarvalhoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São, Cristóvão.
José Teles de MendonçaDepartment of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil.
Valter Joviniano de Santana FilhoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São, Cristóvão.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Tiradentes · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly mobilization and physical exercise are considered fundamental components in cardiovascular surgery rehabilitation; however, occasionally they are inadequate for inhibiting functional decline. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a promising tool in cardiovascular rehabilitation; however, to date, no randomized clinical trial has measured the effects of NMES on functional capacity and quality of life in patients who undergo routine cardiac surgery with a short intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of NMES on walking ability, muscle strength, functional independence, and quality of life in cardiac valve surgery patients in the immediate postoperative period.

methodsA randomized, parallel, controlled, 2-arm clinical trial with assessor blinding was conducted. Fifty-nine adult patients in the preoperative period after cardiac valve reconstruction and/or replacement were randomly assigned to a control or intervention group. The intervention group underwent NMES in the quadriceps and gastrocnemius, bilaterally, for 60 minutes, for up to 10 sessions. The primary outcome was ambulation ability, assessed through the Six-Minute Walk Test and Walking Speed Test at postoperative day 5 (5PO). Secondary outcomes were muscular strength (assessed through the Medical Research Council scale), functional independence measure (assessed through the Functional Independence Measurement Questionnaire), and quality of life (assessed through the Nottingham Health Profile) at baseline (preoperative) and at postoperative days 3 and 5.

resultsThe baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, except for body mass index. There was no statistically significant difference, with a small effect size, between both groups regarding the distance walked (95% CI, -64.87 to 65.97) and walking speed (95% CI, -0.55 to 0.57). There was a statistically significant difference in upper-limb muscle strength loss and decline in mobility at postoperative day 3, which had a tendency to recover to initial values at 5PO, in both groups. No significant between-group difference was noted for muscle strength, functional independence, and quality of life.

conclusionsThe use of NMES had no effect on walking ability, strength, quality of life, or functional outcome in the postoperative period for patients that underwent regular valve replacement.

Indexed as

AdultEarly AmbulationElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHeart ValvesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalPostoperative CarePostoperative PeriodQuadriceps MuscleTreatment OutcomeWalkingWalk Test

Identifiers

PMID30431575
PMCPMC6257613
OpenAlexW2900816918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.