Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30431199›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Social decision-making in the brain: Input-state-output modelling reveals patterns of effective connectivity underlying reciprocal choices.

Daniel Shaw, Kristína Czekóová, Martin Gajdoš, Rostislav Staněk, Jiří Špalek, Milan Brázdil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Altered Patterns of Dynamic Functional Connectivity Underpin Reduced Expressions of Social-Emotional Reciprocity in Autistic Adults.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel ShawDepartment of Psychology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1139-8301
Kristína CzekóováBehavioural and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martin GajdošMultimodal and Functional Imaging Laboratory, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Rostislav StaněkDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiří ŠpalekDepartment of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Milan BrázdilBehavioural and Social Neuroscience Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová agentura České republiky (GA ČR) GA16-18261S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During social interactions, decision-making involves mutual reciprocity-each individual's choices are simultaneously a consequence of, and antecedent to those of their interaction partner. Neuroeconomic research has begun to unveil the brain networks underpinning social decision-making, but we know little about the patterns of neural connectivity within them that give rise to reciprocal choices. To investigate this, the present study measured the behaviour and brain function of pairs of individuals (N = 66) whilst they played multiple rounds of economic exchange comprising an iterated ultimatum game. During these exchanges, both players could attempt to maximise their overall monetary gain by reciprocating their opponent's prior behaviour-they could promote generosity by rewarding it, and/or discourage unfair play through retaliation. By adapting a model of reciprocity from experimental economics, we show that players' choices on each exchange are captured accurately by estimating their expected utility (EU) as a reciprocal reaction to their opponent's prior behaviour. We then demonstrate neural responses that map onto these reciprocal choices in two brain regions implicated in social decision-making: right anterior insula (AI) and anterior/anterior-mid cingulate cortex (aMCC). Finally, with behavioural Dynamic Causal Modelling, we identified player-specific patterns of effective connectivity between these brain regions with which we estimated each player's choices with over 70% accuracy; namely, bidirectional connections between AI and aMCC that are modulated differentially by estimates of EU from our reciprocity model. This input-state-output modelling procedure therefore reveals systematic brain-behaviour relationships associated with the reciprocal choices characterising interactive social decision-making.

Indexed as

ConnectomeInterpersonal RelationsSocial PerceptionAdultAgedCerebral CortexChoice BehaviorDecision MakingExecutive FunctionGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetYoung Adultanterior insulaanterior (mid-)cingulate cortexbehavioural Dynamic Causal Modellingconnectivityiterated ultimatum gamereciprocitysocial decision-making

Identifiers

PMID30431199
PMCPMC6587762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.