Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430961›Full record

Trial reportPsychological medicine2019

Prediction of remission in pharmacotherapy of untreated major depression: development and validation of multivariable prediction models.

Toshi A Furukawa, Tadashi Kato, Yoshihiro Shinagawa, Kazuhira Miki, Hirokazu Fujita, Naohisa Tsujino, Masaki Kondo, Masatoshi Inagaki, Mitsuhiko Yamada

Abstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychological medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. mGluR5 Facilitates Long-Term Synaptic Depression in a Stress-Induced Depressive Mouse Model.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Toshi A FurukawaDepartment of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2159-3776
Tadashi KatoAratama Kokorono Clinic, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshihiro ShinagawaShiki Clinic, Nagoya, Japan.
Kazuhira MikiMiki Mental Clinic, Yokohama, Japan.
Hirokazu FujitaCenter to Promote Creativity in Medical Education, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Nankoku, Japan.
Naohisa TsujinoDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Toho University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaki KondoDepartment of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Masatoshi InagakiDepartment of Psychiatry, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Japan.
Mitsuhiko YamadaDepartment of Neuropsychopharmacology, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is increasingly recognized as a chronic and relapsing disorder. However, an important minority of patients who start treatment for their major depressive episode recover to euthymia. It is clinically important to be able to predict such individuals.

methodsThe study is a secondary analysis of a recently completed pragmatic megatrial examining first- and second-line treatments for hitherto untreated episodes of non-psychotic unipolar major depression (n = 2011). Using the first half of the cohort as the derivation set, we applied multiply-imputed stepwise logistic regression with backward selection to build a prediction model to predict remission, defined as scoring 4 or less on the Patient Health Quetionnaire-9 at week 9. We used three successively richer sets of predictors at baseline only, up to week 1, and up to week 3. We examined the external validity of the derived prediction models with the second half of the cohort.

resultsIn total, 37.0% (95% confidence interval 34.8-39.1%) were in remission at week 9. Only the models using data up to week 1 or 3 showed reasonable performance. Age, education, length of episode and depression severity remained in the multivariable prediction models. In the validation set, the discrimination of the prediction model was satisfactory with the area under the curve of 0.73 (0.70-0.77) and 0.82 (0.79-0.85), while the calibration was excellent with non-significant goodness-of-fit χ2 values (p = 0.41 and p = 0.29), respectively.

conclusionsPatients and clinicians can use these prediction models to estimate their predicted probability of achieving remission after acute antidepressant therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrognosisPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRemission InductionSeverity of Illness IndexAntidepressive AgentsMajor depressionpharmacotherapyprediction modelremission

Identifiers

PMID30430961
PMCPMC6763536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.