Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430902›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurotrauma2019

Electrophysiological Guidance of Epidural Electrode Array Implantation over the Human Lumbosacral Spinal Cord to Enable Motor Function after Chronic Paralysis.

Jonathan S Calvert, Peter J Grahn, Jeffrey A Strommen, Igor A Lavrov, Lisa A Beck, Megan L Gill, Margaux B Linde, Desmond A Brown, Meegan G Van Straaten, Daniel D Veith and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurotrauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02592668 nacompletednot on this map

A Feasibility Study: Epidural Stimulation to Enable Volitional Movement After Chronic Complete Paralysis in Humans.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2016 to 2019Enrolled2ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsEpidural Stimulator
NCT06438991 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Epidural Spinal Cord Stimulation for Lower Extremity Motor Function in Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrigham and Women's HospitalRan2024 to 2028Enrolled10ConditionsSpinal Cord InjuryArmsAdjustment of spinal cord stimulation parameters for voluntary motor control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Jonathan S Calvert1 Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Peter J Grahn2 Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jeffrey A Strommen3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Igor A Lavrov2 Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Lisa A Beck3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Megan L Gill3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Margaux B Linde3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Desmond A Brown2 Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Meegan G Van Straaten3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Daniel D Veith3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Cesar Lopez3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Dimitry G Sayenko4 Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Yury P Gerasimenko4 Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
V Reggie Edgerton4 Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Kristin D Zhao3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kendall H Lee2 Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Mayo Clinic · USHouston Methodist · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) of the spinal cord has been shown to restore function after spinal cord injury (SCI). Characterization of EES-evoked motor responses has provided a basic understanding of spinal sensorimotor network activity related to EES-enabled motor activity of the lower extremities. However, the use of EES-evoked motor responses to guide EES system implantation over the spinal cord and their relation to post-operative EES-enabled function in humans with chronic paralysis attributed to SCI has yet to be described. Herein, we describe the surgical and intraoperative electrophysiological approach used, followed by initial EES-enabled results observed in 2 human subjects with motor complete paralysis who were enrolled in a clinical trial investigating the use of EES to enable motor functions after SCI. The 16-contact electrode array was initially positioned under fluoroscopic guidance. Then, EES-evoked motor responses were recorded from select leg muscles and displayed in real time to determine electrode array proximity to spinal cord regions associated with motor activity of the lower extremities. Acceptable array positioning was determined based on achievement of selective proximal or distal leg muscle activity, as well as bilateral muscle activation. Motor response latencies were not significantly different between intraoperative recordings and post-operative recordings, indicating that array positioning remained stable. Additionally, EES enabled intentional control of step-like activity in both subjects within the first 5 days of testing. These results suggest that the use of EES-evoked motor responses may guide intraoperative positioning of epidural electrodes to target spinal cord circuitry to enable motor functions after SCI.

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedAdultElectromyographyEpidural SpaceEvoked Potentials, MotorHumansIntraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringLocomotionLumbosacral RegionMaleNeurosurgical ProceduresParalysisSpinal Cord InjuriesSpinal Cord Stimulationelectrically evoked spinal motor potentialsepidural electrical stimulation, spinal cord injuryneuromodulationspinal cord intraoperative electrophysiology

Identifiers

PMID30430902
PMCPMC6482916
OpenAlexW2901744622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.