Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430751›Full record

ReviewMolecular oncology2019

Involvement of the long noncoding RNA NEAT1 in carcinogenesis.

Christiane Klec, Felix Prinz, Martin Pichler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Doxorubicin Effects Breast Cancer Proliferation via the NEAT1/miR-410-3p Axis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. NEAT1 promotes genome stability via mGenes & development · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christiane KlecDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz (MUG), Austria.
Felix PrinzDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz (MUG), Austria.
Martin PichlerDivision of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz (MUG), Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Altered expression levels of the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) nuclear-enriched abundant transcript 1 (NEAT1) have been reported in different types of cancer. More than half of the NEAT1 studies in cancer have been published within the last 2 years. In this review, we discuss very recent developments and insights into NEAT1 contribution to carcinogenesis. Summarizing the literature, it becomes obvious that NEAT1 is a lncRNA highly de-/upregulated in a variety of cancer entities, in which it primarily acts as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) which sponges tumor-suppressive microRNA (miRNA). The sponged miRNA lose their ability to degrade, silence, or hamper translation of their downstream-mostly oncogenic-target transcripts, ultimately promoting carcinogenesis. This role of NEAT1 function in tumorigenesis suggests it may be a prognostic biomarker as well as potential therapeutic target, pending the completion of further studies into the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisHumansMicroRNAsMolecular Targeted TherapyNeoplasmsRNA, Long NoncodingBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsNEAT1 long non-coding RNA, humanRNA, Long NoncodingcancerceRNAlncRNAmiRNANEAT1

Identifiers

PMID30430751
PMCPMC6322192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.