Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430711›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Machine learning of brain gray matter differentiates sex in a large forensic sample.

Nathaniel E Anderson, Keith A Harenski, Carla L Harenski, Michael R Koenigs, Jean Decety, Vince D Calhoun, Kent A Kiehl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sex Categories.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025
    Article
  4. Brain Sex: Differences That Do Not Differentiate.Archives of sexual behavior · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. "Precision Medicine" and the Failed Search for Binary Brain Sex Differences to Address Gender Behavioral Health Disparities.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Do Sex and Gender Have Separate Identities?Archives of sexual behavior · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sex is predicted by spatial memory multivariate activation patterns.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Classifying handedness with MRI.Neuroimage. Reports · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nathaniel E AndersonThe Mind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-8823-2185
Keith A HarenskiThe Mind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Carla L HarenskiThe Mind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4382-6921
Michael R KoenigsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Jean DecetyUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Kent A KiehlThe Mind Research Network & Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Mind Research Network · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ABBOTT, CHRISTOPHER C · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
Informed Data-Driven Fusion of Behavior, Brain Function, and GenesR01EB005846 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2005 to 2016
$5.5M
Male/Female differences in psychosis and mood disorders:Dynamic imaging-genomic models for characterizing and predicting psychosis and mood dR01MH118695 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Socio-moral processing in psychopathy and substance abuseR01DA026505 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
The Cognitive Neuroscience of Female PsychopathyR01MH085010 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2009 to 2013
$3.2M
Neurocognitive Changes Associated with Behavioral Treatment in Cocaine AbusersR01DA020870 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2005 to 2009
$3.0M
Action Monitoring, Action Observation and Dopamine Genes as Predictors of SubstanR01DA026964 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
NEUROCOGNITIVE ASSESSMENT OF 'CALLOUS' CONDUCT DISORDERED YOUTHR01MH071896 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
ERP and fMRI of emotion and cognition in psychopathyR01MH070539 · NIMH · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI KIEHL, KENT A · 2005 to 2008
$1.2M
MacArthur FoundationNIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB005846NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB005846NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA020870NIDA NIH HHS R01DA020870NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026505NIDA NIH HHS R01DA026505NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026964NIDA NIH HHS R01DA026964NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIGMS NIH HHS P20GM103472NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070539NIMH NIH HHS R01MH070539NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH071896NIMH NIH HHS R01MH071896NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085010NIMH NIH HHS R01MH085010NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differences between males and females have been extensively documented in biological, psychological, and behavioral domains. Among these, sex differences in the rate and typology of antisocial behavior remains one of the most conspicuous and enduring patterns among humans. However, the nature and extent of sexual dimorphism in the brain among antisocial populations remains mostly unexplored. Here, we seek to understand sex differences in brain structure between incarcerated males and females in a large sample (n = 1,300) using machine learning. We apply source-based morphometry, a contemporary multivariate approach for quantifying gray matter measured with magnetic resonance imaging, and carry these parcellations forward using machine learning to classify sex. Models using components of brain gray matter volume and concentration were able to differentiate between males and females with greater than 93% generalizable accuracy. Highly differentiated components include orbitofrontal and frontopolar regions, proportionally larger in females, and anterior medial temporal regions proportionally larger in males. We also provide a complimentary analysis of a nonforensic healthy control sample and replicate our 93% sex discrimination. These findings demonstrate that the brains of males and females are highly distinguishable. Understanding sex differences in the brain has implications for elucidating variability in the incidence and progression of disease, psychopathology, and differences in psychological traits and behavior. The reliability of these differences confirms the importance of sex as a moderator of individual differences in brain structure and suggests future research should consider sex specific models.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedBrainChildCrimeCriminalsFemaleForensic PathologyGray MatterHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Agedantisocial behaviorgendermachine learningMRIsexsource-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID30430711
PMCPMC6397072
OpenAlexW2900573140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.