Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430388›Full record

ArticleNatural products and bioprospecting2019

LC-ESI-IT-MS/MS and MALDI-TOF Approach: Identification of Natural Polymers from Rhizophora mangle Barks and Determination of Their Analgesic and Anti-inflammatory Properties.

Leonardo Mendes de Souza Mesquita, Caroline Fabri Bittencourt Rodrigues, Cláudia Quintino da Rocha, Mayara Silveira Bianchim, Clenilson Martins Rodrigues, Vanda Maria de Oliveira, Henrique Hessel Gaeta, Mariana Novo Belchor, Marcos Hikari Toyama, Wagner Vilegas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Natural products and bioprospecting, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative metabolic study of the chloroform fraction of threeJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  2. Methanolic Extract ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leonardo Mendes de Souza MesquitaLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil.
Caroline Fabri Bittencourt RodriguesLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil.
Cláudia Quintino da RochaLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil.
Mayara Silveira BianchimLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil.
Clenilson Martins RodriguesEmbrapa Agroenergy, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, W3 Norte, PqEB, Brasília, DF, 70770-901, Brazil.
Vanda Maria de OliveiraEmbrapa Agroenergy, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, W3 Norte, PqEB, Brasília, DF, 70770-901, Brazil.
Henrique Hessel GaetaLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil.
Mariana Novo BelchorLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil.
Marcos Hikari ToyamaLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil.
Wagner VilegasLaboratory of Bioprospection of Natural Products (LBPN), UNESP - São Paulo State University/Coastal Campus of São Vicente, Pça Infante Dom Henrique S/N, São Vicente, São Paulo, CEP: 11330-900, Brazil. wagner.vilegas@unesp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2009/52237-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2014/23951-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We recognize the chemical composition of the acetonic extract of Rhizophora mangle barks (AERM) using mass spectrometry analysis [liquid chromatography (LC)-ESI-IT-MS/MS and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight-MS (MALDI-TOF)]. Analgesic activity was evaluated by formalin and tail-flick experimental assays. Anti-inflammatory activity was performed by paw edema test induced by carrageenan and 48/80 compounds. The first series of experiments involved [LC]-FIA-IT-MS/MS with 11 separated catechins derivatives until degree of polymerization 3 (DP3). The spectra obtained by MALDI-TOF analysis of the AERM presented two homologous series: one based on polymers of m/z 288 Da increments (up to DP12) and another series based on polymers of m/z [288 + 162] Da increments (up to DP11). In addition to these series of flavan-3-ol, each DP had a subset of masses with a variation of - 16 Da (homologous series of afzelechins-m/z 873-3465 Da) and + 16 Da (homologous series of gallocatechins-m/z 905-3497 Da). A similar pattern with homologous series of gallocatechins and afzelechins could also be observed for a fifth and a sixth monohexoside series: glucogallocatechins (m/z 779-3371) and glucoafzelechins (m/z 747-3339). The intraperitoneal administration of different doses of AERM (50, 150 and 300 µg mL

Indexed as

Anti-inflammatoryCatechinsMangrovesMorphine-like effectTannins

Identifiers

PMID30430388
PMCPMC6328426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.