Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2019
The predictive value of global longitudinal strain on late infarct size in patients with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with a primary percutaneous coronary intervention.
Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Clinical Significance and Potential of Complex Diagnosis for a Large Scar Area Following Myocardial Infarction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Global, segmental, and layer-specific two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography immediately after acute myocardial infarction as a predictive tool to assess myocardial viability and scar size.Journal of echocardiography · 2025Article
- Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and angiographic predictors for the final infarct size assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance in acute STEMI patients after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2024Article
- Accuracy of Global Longitudinal and Territorial Longitudinal Strain in Determining Myocardial Viability in Comparison to Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Out of Window Period Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction Patients.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2022Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of strain imaging in predicting myocardial viability after an ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Medicine · 2020Article
- Comparison of myocardial deformation indices during rest and after activity in untreated hyperthyroid patients with normal population.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Late infarct size (IS) after ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a determinant of subsequent mortality. Late Gadolinium enhancement in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMRI) is the gold standard for IS measurement, however, it is not readily accessible in many areas. We aimed to evaluate the value of early baseline 2D-echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) for the prediction of late IS after STEMI. From October 2017 to July 2018, we studied 100 patients with their 1st anterior STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Baseline GLS calculation was performed within 48 h of admission. In addition, the average value of the nine segments supplied by the LAD was assessed separately (anterior GLS). Infarct size was assessed 3 months later using LGE-CMRI, and large infarcts were defined as ≥ 20% LV myocardium covered by scar. Based on CMRI, we defined two groups; 57 patients with large infarcts (group I) and 43 patients with small infarcts (group II). Both groups were matched in all baseline demographics and risk factors. There was a good and significant correlation between GLS and late IS (r = - 0.840, P < 0.001). This correlation was even higher for anterior GLS (r = - 0.867, P < 0.001). ROC analysis showed a cut-off point of GLS (- 13%) that identified large late IS with a sensitivity and specificity of 66.7% and 88.4% respectively (AUC = 0.85). For anterior GLS, the cut-off point was - 9.6% (Sensitivity 94%, specificity 86%, AUC = 0.9). We concluded that baseline GLS significantly predicts late IS after anterior STEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30430328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.