ArticleAnnals of intensive care2018
ICU physicians' and internists' survival predictions for patients evaluated for admission to the intensive care unit.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Voices from the ICU: a qualitative study of healthcare providers' decision-making experiences during the provision of life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units of public and private referral hospitals in Uganda.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Early prediction of mortality upon intensive care unit admission.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Long-stay ICU patients with frailty: mortality and recovery outcomes at 6 months.Annals of intensive care · 2024Article
- Subjective and objective survival prediction in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Prioritization of ICU beds with renal replacement therapy support by court order and mortality in a Brazilian metropolitan area.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Are Baseline Levels of Gas6 and Soluble Mer Predictors of Mortality and Organ Damage in Patients with Sepsis? The Need-Speed Trial Database.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Physicians' Views and Agreement about Patient- and Context-Related Factors Influencing ICU Admission Decisions: A Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Factors associated with survival of patients with solid Cancer alive after intensive care unit discharge between 2005 and 2013.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Admission to the intensive care unit: the need to study complexity and solutions.Annals of intensive care · 2019Article
- VEGF, TNF-α, and PCT efficiency for traumatic brain injury prognosis evaluation in the first 72 h.Journal of circulating biomarkersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA higher chance of survival is a key justification for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). This implies that physicians should be able to accurately estimate a patient's prognosis, whether cared for on the ward or in the ICU. We aimed to determine whether physicians' survival predictions correlate with the admission decisions and with patients' observed survival. Consecutive ICU consultations for internal medicine patients were included. The ICU physician and the internist were asked to predict patient survival with intensive care and with care on the ward using 5 categories of probabilities (< 10%, 10-40%, 41-60%, 61-90%, > 90%). Patient mortality at 28 days was recorded.
resultsThirty ICU physicians and 97 internists assessed 201 patients for intensive care. Among the patients, 140 (69.7%) were admitted to the ICU. Fifty-eight (28.9%) died within 28 days. Admission to intensive care was associated with predicted survival gain in the ICU, particularly for survival estimates made by ICU physicians. Observed survival was associated with predicted survival, for both groups of physicians. The discrimination of the predictions for survival with intensive care, measured by the area under the ROC curve, was 0.63 for ICU physicians and 0.76 for internists; for survival on the ward the areas under the ROC curves were 0.69 and 0.74, respectively.
conclusionsPhysicians are able to predict survival probabilities when they assess patients for intensive care, albeit imperfectly. Internists are more accurate than ICU physicians. However, ICU physicians' estimates more strongly influence the admission decision. Closer collaboration between ICU physicians and internists is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.