Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430249›Full record

Observational studyLung2019

Identification of Phenotypes in People with COPD: Influence of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, Body Composition and Skeletal Muscle Strength.

Rafaella F Xavier, Ana Carolina A C Pereira, Aline C Lopes, Vinícius Cavalheri, Regina M C Pinto, Alberto Cukier, Ercy M C Ramos, Celso R F Carvalho

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Lung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rafaella F XavierDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9958-4135
Ana Carolina A C PereiraDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Aline C LopesDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Vinícius CavalheriSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Regina M C PintoPulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Clinics Hospital, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Alberto CukierPulmonary Division, Heart Institute (InCor), Clinics Hospital, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ercy M C RamosDepartment of Physical Therapy, State University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Celso R F CarvalhoDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. cscarval@usp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2013/20676-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) present high prevalence of physical inactivity that leads to a negative effect on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The present study investigated COPD phenotypes according to their levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, as well as body composition and skeletal muscle strength.

methodsThis is an observational and cross-sectional study. Anthropometric data and COPD clinical control were collected and all participants underwent assessments of lung function, HRQoL, dyspnoea, levels of physical activity and sedentary behaviour, body composition and skeletal muscle strength. Participants were classified using hierarchical cluster analysis. Age, dyspnoea and obstruction (ADO) index was used to determine prognosis and calculated for each cluster.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-two participants were included. Three distinct phenotypes were identified. Participants in phenotype 1 were more physically active, less sedentary and had better body composition and lower ADO index (p < 0.0001 for all variables). Overall, participants in phenotypes 2 and 3 were less physically active, more sedentary having a higher ADO index. However, participants in phenotype 2 were older, whereas participants in phenotype 3 had worse HRQoL, clinical control and body composition. Lung function did not differ across the three phenotypes.

conclusionsOur results show that physical activity, sedentary behaviour and body composition should be considered to determine phenotypes in people with COPD and are involved in the prognosis of the disease. Less sedentary patients have better prognosis while age, body composition and clinical control seems to differentiate physically inactive patients.

Indexed as

Body CompositionExerciseMuscle StrengthSedentary BehaviorAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth StatusHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalPhenotypePrognosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDaily life physical activityHealth-related quality of lifeMuscle massPrognosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.