Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430230›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2018

Surgical anatomy of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Isaac Cheruiyot, Vincent Kipkorir, Brandon Michael Henry, Jeremiah Munguti, Roberto Cirocchi, Paul Odula, Linda M Wong, Beda Olabu, Jerzy Walocha

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Incidence of Injury to External Branch of Superior Laryngeal Nerve as Diagnosed by Acoustic Voice Analysis After Thyroidectomy.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Isaac CheruiyotDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya. isaacbmn@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1211-8247
Vincent KipkorirDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Brandon Michael HenryInternational Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, 12 Kopernika St., 31-034, Krakow, Poland.
Jeremiah MungutiDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Roberto CirocchiDepartment of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Piazza dell'Universitá, 1, 06123, Perugia, PG, Italy.
Paul OdulaDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Linda M WongInternational Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, 12 Kopernika St., 31-034, Krakow, Poland.
Beda OlabuDepartment of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Jerzy WalochaInternational Evidence-Based Anatomy Working Group, 12 Kopernika St., 31-034, Krakow, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo provide a comprehensive evidence-based assessment of the anatomical characteristics of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve (EBSLN). MATERIALS AND

methodsA thorough systematic search was performed on the major electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect to identify eligible studies. Data were extracted and pooled into a meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were the EBSLN identification rate (total number of EBSLN identified divided by the total number of dissected hemilarynges) and the prevalence of various EBSLN types.

resultsA total of 56 studies (n = 13,444 hemilarynges) were included. The overall pooled EBSLN identification rate was 89.24% (95% CI 85.49-92.49). This rate was higher for cadaveric (95.00%; 95% CI 89.73-99.35) compared to that reported in intraoperative studies (86.99%; 95% CI 82.37-91.01). Significantly higher identification rates were reported for studies in which intraoperative nerve monitoring was used (95.90%; 95% CI 94.30-97.25) compared to those which only relied on direct visual identification of the EBSLN (76.56%; 95% CI 69.34-83.08). Overall, Cernea type IIa (nerves crossing the superior thyroid artery less than 1 cm above the upper edge of the superior thyroid pole) and Friedman type 1 (nerves running their entire course superficial to the inferior pharyngeal constrictor) were the most prevalent (41.84%; 95% CI 33.28-48.08 and 50%; 95% CI 29.90-65.62, respectively). The combined prevalence of Cernea IIa and IIb (nerves crossing the superior thyroid artery below the upper edge of the superior thyroid pole) was higher in intraoperative studies compared to that in cadaveric studies (64.3% vs 49.4%). The EBSLN coursed medial to the superior thyroid artery in 70.98% (95% CI 55.14-84.68) of all cases.

conclusionThe use of intraoperative nerve monitoring improves EBSLN identification rates. In light of the highly variable anatomical patterns displayed by the EBSLN, thorough pre-operative knowledge of its anatomy can be crucial in minimizing incidences of its iatrogenic injury.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansLaryngeal MusclesLaryngeal Nerve InjuriesLaryngeal NervesMaleMonitoring, IntraoperativeThyroidectomyThyroid GlandCernea’s classificationExternal branch of superior laryngeal nerveFriedman’s classificationIntraoperative nerve monitoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.