Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430098›Full record

ArticleSouth Asian journal of cancer

Impact of cytogenetics on outcomes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Rachana Chennamaneni, Sadashivudu Gundeti, Meher Lakshmi Konatam, Stalin Bala, Ashok Kumar, Lakshmi Srinivas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in South Asian journal of cancer. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Overview on Aneuploidy in Childhood B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Association ofGenes · 2020
    Article
  8. Evaluation of Cytogenetic Abnormalities in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachana ChennamaneniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Sadashivudu GundetiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Meher Lakshmi KonatamDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Stalin BalaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ashok KumarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Lakshmi SrinivasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIn acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), the most important prognostic factors are age, leukocyte count at presentation, immunophenotype, and cytogenetic abnormalities. The cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with distinct immunologic phenotypes of ALL and characteristic outcomes.

aimsThe present study was primarily aimed at analyzing the impact of cytogenetics on postinduction responses and event-free survival (EFS) in pediatric patients with ALL. The secondary objective was to study the overall survival (OS). SUBJECTS AND

methodsA total of 240 patients with age <18 years and diagnosed with ALL between January 2011 and June 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Cytogenetics was evaluated with conventional karyotyping or reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Based on cytogenetic abnormalities, the patients were grouped into five categories, and the outcomes were analyzed.

resultsOf the 240 patients, 125 (52%) patients had evaluable cytogenetics. Of these, 77 (61.6%) patients had normal cytogenetics, 19 (15.2%) had t(9;22) translocation, 10 (8%) had unfavorable cytogenetics which included t(9;11), hypodiploidy, and complex karyotype, 10 (8%) had favorable cytogenetics which included t(12;21), t(1;19), and high hyperdiploidy, 9 (7.2%) had miscellaneous cytogenetics. Seventy-one percent of patients were treated with MCP 841 protocol, while 29% of patients received BFM-ALL 95 protocol. The 3-year EFS and OS of the entire group were 52% and 58%, respectively. On univariate analysis, EFS and OS were significantly lower in t(9;22) compared to normal cytogenetics (

conclusionsCytogenetics plays an important role in the molecular characterization of ALL defining the prognostic subgroups. Patients with unfavorable cytogenetics and with t(9;22) have poorer outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute lymphoblastic leukemiacytogeneticsevent-free survivaloverall survivalpediatric

Identifiers

PMID30430098
PMCPMC6190389
OpenAlexW2894961387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.