Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30430069›Full record

ArticleJournal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry

Histopathological Evaluation of Dental Pulp of Primary Teeth Pulpotomized with Formocresol with/without a Capping Agent: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fatemeh Kadkhodaei Oliadarani, Rosa Haghgoo, Fatemeh Mashhadiabbas, Mehrdad Kahvand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatemeh Kadkhodaei OliadaraniDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Rosa HaghgooDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh MashhadiabbasDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshty University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehrdad KahvandDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to assess the reaction of dental pulp of pulpotomized teeth with/without applying a capping agent. This study was performed as randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis split-mouth clinical trial was conducted on eight pairs of primary canine teeth scheduled for extraction as part of orthodontic treatment. The teeth were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, canine teeth were restored with amalgam after pulpotomy with formocresol. In the control group, zinc oxide eugenol paste was applied as the capping agent after pulpotomy with formocresol, and the teeth were then restored with amalgam. After 1 month, the teeth were extracted in both groups and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis. Pulp reaction was assessed in terms of pathological parameters. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test and Fisher's exact test. The statistical analysis software was SPSS 16.

resultsNo significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of inflammation, vitality, internal resorption, bleeding, presence of osteoclasts and dentinoclasts, and internal regeneration. Dentinal bridge did not form in any group.

conclusionAccording to the results of this study, formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth can be completed without the application of a capping agent.

Indexed as

Histological analysisprimary teethpulp capping agentpulpotomy

Identifiers

PMID30430069
PMCPMC6187875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.