ReviewThe western journal of emergency medicine2018
Scholarship in Emergency Medicine: A Primer for Junior Academics Part I: Writing and Publishing.
Review in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Educator's Blueprint: Seven Strategies for Turning Peer Review Into Scholarly Growth.AEM education and training · 2026Article
- Educator's Blueprint: Optimizing the Resident Research Experience.AEM education and training · 2026Article
- Developing Simulation-Based Mastery Learning Curricula for Emergency Medicine Skills Training.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Mentorship as a Catalyst for Academic Writing in Emergency Medicine.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- The write of passage: Overcoming barriers to academic writing during emergency medicine fellowship training.AEM education and training · 2025Article
- Resident Research in Emergency Medicine: An Introduction and Primer.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Enhancing your scholarship as a family medicine junior faculty member.Family medicine and community health · 2020Article
- Measuring Scholarly Productivity: A Primer for Junior Faculty. Part III: Understanding Publication Metrics.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The landscape of scholarly writing, publishing, and university promotion can be complex and challenging. Mentorship may be limited. To be successful it is important to understand the key components of writing and publishing. In this article, we provide expert consensus recommendations on four key challenges faced by junior faculty: writing the paper; selecting contributors and the importance of authorship order; journal selection and indexing; and responding to critiques. After reviewing this paper, the reader should have an enhanced understanding of these challenges and strategies to successfully address them.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.