Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30429920›Full record

ArticleThe western journal of emergency medicine2018

Analysis of Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices Presenting to an Urban Emergency Department.

Ryan P McKillip, Anand Gopalsami, Magdeline Montoya, Gene Kim, James J Walter, Colleen Juricek, Eric Shappell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. My Broken Heart.Journal of education & teaching in emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Patterns of emergency department utilization for LVAD patients compared with non-LVAD patients.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2020
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan P McKillipAdvocate Christ Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Oak Lawn, Illinois.
Anand GopalsamiCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Magdeline MontoyaUniversity of California San Francisco, Department of Pediatrics, San Francisco, California.
Gene KimUniversity of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Chicago, Illinois.
James J WalterUniversity of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Section of Emergency Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Colleen JuricekUniversity of Chicago, Department of Surgery, Chicago, Illinois.
Eric ShappellHarvard University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
University of Chicago · USAdvocate Christ Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USHarvard University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLeft ventricular assist device (LVAD) insertion is an increasingly common intervention for patients with advanced heart failure; however, published literature on the emergency department (ED) presentation of this population is limited. The objective of this study was to characterize ED presentations of patients with LVADs with a focus on device-specific complications to inform provider education and preparation initiatives.

methodsThis was a retrospective chart review of all patients with LVADs followed at an urban academic medical center presenting to the ED over a five-year period (July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2014). Two abstractors reviewed 45 randomly selected charts to standardize the abstraction process and establish a priori categories for reason for presentation to the ED. Remaining charts were then divided evenly for review by one of the two abstractors. Primary outcomes for this study were (1) frequency of and (2) reason for presentation to the ED by patients with LVADs.

resultsOf 349 patients with LVADs identified, 143 (41.0%) had ED encounters during the study period. There were 620 total ED encounters, (range 1 to 32 encounters per patient, median=3, standard deviation=5.3). Among the encounters, 431 (69.5%) resulted in admission. The most common reasons for presentation were bleeding (e.g., gastrointestinal, epistaxis) (182, 29.4%); infection (127, 20.5%); heart failure exacerbation (68, 11.0%); pain (56, 9.0%); other (45, 7.3%); and arrhythmias (40, 6.5%). Fifty-two encounters (8.4%) were device-specific; these patients frequently presented with abnormal device readings (37, 6.0%). Interventions for device-specific presentations included anticoagulation regimen adjustment (16/52, 30.8%), pump exchange (9, 17.3%), and hardware repair (6, 11.5%). Pump thrombosis occurred in 23 cases (3.7% of all encounters). No patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation or died in the ED.

conclusionThis is the largest study known to the investigators to report the rate of ED presentations of patients with LVADs and provide analysis of device-specific presentations. In patients who do have device-specific ED presentations, pump thrombosis is a common diagnosis and can present without device alarms. Specialized LVAD education and preparation initiatives for ED providers should emphasize the recognition and management of the most common and critical conditions for this patient population, which have been identified in this study as bleeding, infection, heart failure, and pump thrombosis.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart-Assist DevicesHeart FailureHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesThrombosis

Identifiers

PMID30429920
PMCPMC6225934
OpenAlexW2891128333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.