Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30429805›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2018

The Neural Mechanism Underlying Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Creativity.

Simeng Gu, Mengdan Gao, Yaoyao Yan, Fushun Wang, Yi-Yuan Tang, Jason H Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Simeng GuDepartment of Psychology, School of Medicine, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Mengdan GaoInstitute of Emotion, School of Psychology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yaoyao YanInstitute of Emotion, School of Psychology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Fushun WangInstitute of Emotion, School of Psychology, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yi-Yuan TangDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, United States.
Jason H HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor Scott & White Health, Temple, TX, United States.
Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CNBaylor Scott & White Health · USInstitute for Advanced Study · USJiangsu University · CNTemple College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creativity is related to both cognition and emotion, which are the two major mental processes, interacting with each other to form psychological processes. Emotion is the major driving force of almost all creativities, sometimes in an unconscious way. Even though there are many studies concerning the relationship between creativity and cognition, there are few studies about the neural mechanisms of the emotional effects on creativity. Here, we introduce a novel model to explain the relationship between emotions and creativities:

Indexed as

basic emotionscognitioncore affectcreativitymonoamine

Identifiers

PMID30429805
PMCPMC6220028
OpenAlexW2898849251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.