Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30429772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Implicit Grasp Force Representation in Human Motor Cortical Recordings.

John E Downey, Jeffrey M Weiss, Sharlene N Flesher, Zachary C Thumser, Paul D Marasco, Michael L Boninger, Robert A Gaunt, Jennifer L Collinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Distinct Neural Modes Carry Information About Attempted Grasp Timing and Force in the Sensorimotor Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

John E DowneyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Jeffrey M WeissDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Sharlene N FlesherDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Zachary C ThumserLaboratory for Bionic Integration, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Paul D MarascoLaboratory for Bionic Integration, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Michael L BoningerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Robert A GauntDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Jennifer L CollingerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
University of Pittsburgh · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · USLouis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order for brain-computer interface (BCI) systems to maximize functionality, users will need to be able to accurately modulate grasp force to avoid dropping heavy objects while also being able to handle fragile items. We present a case-study consisting of two experiments designed to identify whether intracortical recordings from the motor cortex of a person with tetraplegia could predict intended grasp force. In the first task, we were able classify neural responses to attempted grasps of four objects, each of which required similar grasp kinematics but different implicit grasp force targets, with 69% accuracy. In the second task, the subject attempted to move a virtual robotic arm in space to grasp a simple virtual object. For each trial, the subject was asked to grasp the virtual object with the force appropriate for one of the four objects from the first experiment, with the goal of measuring an implicit representation of grasp force. While the subject knew the grasp force during all phases of the trial, accurate classification was only achieved during active grasping, not while the hand moved to, transported, or released the object. In both tasks, misclassifications were most often to the object with an adjacent force requirement. In addition to the implications for understanding the representation of grasp force in motor cortex, these results are a first step toward creating intelligent algorithms to help BCI users grasp and manipulate a variety of objects that will be encountered in daily life.

Indexed as

brain-computer interfacegrasp forceintracorticalmotor cortexneuroprosthetics

Identifiers

PMID30429772
PMCPMC6220062
OpenAlexW2899334757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.