Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30429733›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Comparison of I-gel for general anesthesia in obese and nonobese patients.

Rati Prabha, Rajesh Raman, Mohammad Parvez Khan, Dinesh Kaushal, Ahsan Khaliq Siddiqui, Haider Abbas

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparing leak pressure of LMACanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Supraglottic airway devices in airway management of obese patients.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rati PrabhaDepartment of Cardiac Anesthesia, LPS Institute of Cardiology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Rajesh RamanDepartment of Anesthesiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mohammad Parvez KhanDepartment of Anesthesiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Dinesh KaushalDepartment of Anesthesiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ahsan Khaliq SiddiquiDepartment of Anesthesiology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Haider AbbasDepartment of Emergency Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ganesh Shankar Vidyarthi Memorial Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextI-gel is a second-generation supraglottic airway device. Despite several studies on i-gel, there are very few studies on the use of i-gel in obese patients.

aimsThe aim of the study was to compare the clinical performance of i-gel between obese and nonobese patients. SETTINGS AND

designProspective, controlled, nonrandomized, hospital-based study. SUBJECTS AND

methodsAfter obtaining informed consent, patients were divided into two groups of 16 patients each: group O consisted of patients with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Data were analyzed using SPSS 20. Continuous, ordinal, and categorical variables were analyzed using students

resultsOLP was slightly higher in Group O (25.38 ± 4.79 cm H

conclusionsWe concluded that i-gel is as effective in obese patients as in nonobese patients when used for securing the airway for surgical procedures.

Indexed as

airway managementAirway managementbronchoscopelaryngeal masksobesity

Identifiers

PMID30429733
PMCPMC6180705
OpenAlexW2904257047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.