Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30429632›Full record

ArticleJournal of emergencies, trauma, and shock

Assessment and Management of Hypotension in the Elderly Patient.

Himanshu L Kataria, Marc A Jacobson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of emergencies, trauma, and shock. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Himanshu L KatariaEmergency Department, Whiston Hospital, St. Helens and Knowsley NHS Teaching Trust, Whiston, Merseyside, UK.
Marc A JacobsonEmergency Department, Whiston Hospital, St. Helens and Knowsley NHS Teaching Trust, Whiston, Merseyside, UK.
Whiston Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElderly patients often present to the emergency department (ED) with nonspecific signs of infection and excessive fluid loss, with limited research into their management. The purpose of this audit was to assess the initial management of hypotensive elderly patients in the ED: observations within 15 min, fluid challenge within 1 h, time to assessment by a physician, and initial management of septic shock. SUBJECTS AND

methodsOnline patient systems were reviewed to find 40 patients >65 years old who were hypotensive (systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure <60 mmHg) in the ED between 1

resultsForty hypotensive patients were identified with an average age of 79.6, with 55% being male. Eighty-three percent had their observations recorded within 15 min of presentation, 35% had their observations repeated within 1 h, and 35% were fluid challenged within 1 h. Nearly 60% patients were reviewed within 1 h by a physician. About 33% patients were in septic shock with 41% receiving IVF within 1 h, and all 40 patient receiving antibiotics. DISCUSSION: The majority of patients had their observations performed within 15 min; however, a smaller percentage was fluid challenged within 1 h with their observations rechecked. Despite a sepsis pathway, hypotensive patients were still not receiving fluids within the hour.

conclusionDeveloping a fast-track protocol for hypotensive elderly patients in the ED could improve initial rehydration management and ensure observations are reported in a timely manner.

Indexed as

Abdominal (and) cardiac evaluation (with sonography in) shockelderlyemergency departmentfluid resuscitationhypotensionsepsis

Identifiers

PMID30429632
PMCPMC6182962
OpenAlexW2911026974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.