Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30429181›Full record

SynthesisCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2018

What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review.

Caitlin R Finley, Derek S Chan, Scott Garrison, Christina Korownyk, Michael R Kolber, Sandra Campbell, Dean T Eurich, Adrienne J Lindblad, Ben Vandermeer, G Michael Allan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 285 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
285citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

285 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

225 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Caitlin R FinleyMedical student, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton. cfinley@ualberta.ca.
Derek S ChanFamily medicine resident, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Scott GarrisonAssociate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Christina KorownykAssociate Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine in the Department of Family Medicine, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Michael R KolberAssociate Professor of Evidence-Based Medicine in the Department of Family Medicine, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Sandra CampbellPublic Services Librarian at the Health Sciences Library, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Dean T EurichProfessor in the School of Public Health, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Adrienne J LindbladKnowledge Translation and Evidence Coordinator for the Alberta College of Family Physicians and Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Family Medicine, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
Ben VandermeerResearch Associate at the Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.
G Michael AllanProfessor of Evidence-Based Medicine in the Department of Family Medicine, at the University of Alberta in Edmonton.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the most commonly presenting conditions in primary care globally, and to compare common reasons for visits (RFVs) as reported by clinicians and patients, as well as among countries of different economic classifications. DATA SOURCES: Twelve scientific databases were searched up to January 2016, and a dual independent review was performed to select primary care studies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they contained 20 000 visits or more (or equivalent volume by patient-clinician interactions) and listed 10 or more RFVs. Dual independent data extraction of study characteristics and RFV rankings was performed. Data analysis was descriptive, with pooled rankings of RFVs across studies. SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria (median 250 000 patients or 83 161 visits). Data were from 12 countries across 5 continents. The 10 most common clinician-reported RFVs were upper respiratory tract infection, hypertension, routine health maintenance, arthritis, diabetes, depression or anxiety, pneumonia, acute otitis media, back pain, and dermatitis. The 10 most common patient-reported RFVs were symptomatic conditions including cough, back pain, abdominal symptoms, pharyngitis, dermatitis, fever, headache, leg symptoms, unspecified respiratory concerns, and fatigue. Globally, upper respiratory tract infection and hypertension were the most common clinician-reported RFVs. In developed countries the next most common RFVs were depression or anxiety and back pain, and in developing countries they were pneumonia and tuberculosis. There was a paucity of available data, particularly from developing countries.

conclusionThere are differences between clinician-reported and patient-reported RFVs to primary care, as well as between developed and developing countries. The results of our review are useful for the development of primary care guidelines, the allocation of resources, and the design of training programs and curricula.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesDeveloping CountriesAbdomenBack PainCoughHumansHypertensionPrimary Health CareRespiratory Tract Infections

Identifiers

PMID30429181
PMCPMC6234945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.