SynthesisCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2018
What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review.
Synthesis in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 285 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
285 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Higher blood pressure targets for hypertension in older adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Electronic Health Record Nudges and Health Care Quality and Outcomes in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Chinese herbal medicine for post-viral fatigue: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- PEER simplified lipid guideline 2023 update: Prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023Guideline
- Systematic review of predictors of hospitalisation for non-specific low back pain with or without referred leg pain.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Information about the natural history of acute infections commonly seen in primary care: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Factors associated with blood pressure control in Swedish primary care patients with hypertension: a cross-sectional study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Trial
- Ameliorating Effects and Autonomic Mechanisms of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Abdominal Pain in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Diagnostic performance of upper airway sampling sites for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza testing.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Effects of a novel differential diagnosis aid for managing patients with unexplained fatigue in primary care: a prospective randomized, controlled, open and multicenter study in primary care.BMC primary care · 2025Trial
- Long-term depressive symptom trajectories and related baseline characteristics in primary care patients: Analysis of the PsicAP clinical trial.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024Trial
- A patient activation intervention in primary care for patients with chronic pain on long term opioid therapy: results from a randomized control trial.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Impact of Neurolens Use on the Quality of Life in Individuals With Headaches: A Randomized Double-Masked, Cross-Over Clinical Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Trial
- Assessing the utility of artificial intelligence throughout the triage outpatients: a prospective randomized controlled clinical study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Trial
- Effectiveness of a New Service Delivery Model for Management of Knee Osteoarthritis in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.Arthritis care & research · 2023Trial
- Implementation and use of technology-enabled blood pressure monitoring and teleconsultation in Singapore's primary care: a qualitative evaluation using the socio-technical systems approach.BMC primary care · 2023Trial
225 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify the most commonly presenting conditions in primary care globally, and to compare common reasons for visits (RFVs) as reported by clinicians and patients, as well as among countries of different economic classifications. DATA SOURCES: Twelve scientific databases were searched up to January 2016, and a dual independent review was performed to select primary care studies. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they contained 20 000 visits or more (or equivalent volume by patient-clinician interactions) and listed 10 or more RFVs. Dual independent data extraction of study characteristics and RFV rankings was performed. Data analysis was descriptive, with pooled rankings of RFVs across studies. SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria (median 250 000 patients or 83 161 visits). Data were from 12 countries across 5 continents. The 10 most common clinician-reported RFVs were upper respiratory tract infection, hypertension, routine health maintenance, arthritis, diabetes, depression or anxiety, pneumonia, acute otitis media, back pain, and dermatitis. The 10 most common patient-reported RFVs were symptomatic conditions including cough, back pain, abdominal symptoms, pharyngitis, dermatitis, fever, headache, leg symptoms, unspecified respiratory concerns, and fatigue. Globally, upper respiratory tract infection and hypertension were the most common clinician-reported RFVs. In developed countries the next most common RFVs were depression or anxiety and back pain, and in developing countries they were pneumonia and tuberculosis. There was a paucity of available data, particularly from developing countries.
conclusionThere are differences between clinician-reported and patient-reported RFVs to primary care, as well as between developed and developing countries. The results of our review are useful for the development of primary care guidelines, the allocation of resources, and the design of training programs and curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30429181PMC6234945What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.