Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30429114›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2018

Improving Self-Management Skills Among People With Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.

W Ben Mortenson, Patricia Branco Mills, Jared Adams, Gurkaran Singh, Megan MacGillivray, Bonita Sawatzky

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03140501 (Improving Self-Management Skills Among People With Spinal Cord Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03140501 naunknown statusnot on this map

Improving Self-Management Skills Among People With Spinal Cord Injury

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of British ColumbiaRan2018 to 2022Enrolled50ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries, Self-Management, Mobile ApplicationArmsMobile application ("app")
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W Ben MortensonDepartment of Occupational Sciences and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-6163
Patricia Branco MillsGF Strong Rehabilitation Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5260-4063
Jared AdamsSelf Care Catalysts Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6109-5013
Gurkaran SinghInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7542-4359
Megan MacGillivrayInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0224-4047
Bonita SawatzkyInternational Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8901-2301
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost people with spinal cord injury will develop secondary complications with potentially devastating consequences. Self-management is a key prevention strategy for averting the development of secondary complications and their recurrence. Several studies have shown that self-management programs improve self-management behaviors and health outcomes in individuals living with chronic conditions such as asthma, diabetes, hypertension, and arthritis. Given the burgeoning health care costs related to secondary complications, we developed an alternative electronic health-based implementation to facilitate the development of self-management skills among people with spinal cord injury.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a self-management app in spinal cord injury populations. The primary outcome is attainment of self-selected, self-management goals. Secondary outcomes include increases in general and self-management self-efficacy and reductions in self-reported health events, health care utilization, and secondary complications related to spinal cord injury. This study also aims to explore how the intervention was implemented and how the app was experienced by end users.

methodsThis study will employ a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods. The quantitative portion of our study will involve a rater-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a stepped wedge design (ie, delayed intervention control group). The primary outcome is successful goal attainment, and secondary outcomes include increases in self-efficacy and reductions in self-reported health events, health care utilization, and secondary conditions related to spinal cord injury. The qualitative portion will consist of semistructured interviews with a subsample of the participants.

resultsWe expect that the mobile self-management app will help people with spinal cord injury to attain their self-management goals, improve their self-efficacy, reduce secondary complications, and decrease health care utilization.

conclusionsIf the results are positive, this study will produce credible new knowledge describing multiple outcomes that people with spinal cord injury realize from an app-based self-management intervention and support its implementation in clinical practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03140501; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03140501 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/73Gw0ZlWZ). INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/11069.

Indexed as

eHealthmHealthself-managementspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID30429114
PMCPMC6301832
OpenAlexW2886025008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.