Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019
Withdrawal of pharmacological treatment for heart failure in patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (TRED-HF): an open-label, pilot, randomised trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 281 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Pilot Feasibility Study in Recovered Heart Failure
Prospective Comparison of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Valsartan on the Outcome of Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: a Pilot Study
Clinical Observation on the Prognosis of Long-term Cardiac Function by Drug Withdrawal in Patients With Peripartum Cardiomyopathy With Cardiac Function Recovery
A Randomised Trial Examining Therapy to Maintain Remission in Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Who cites it
281 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 612 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Pooled it
- Minimization or withdrawal of oral pharmacotherapy in chronic heart failure patients with improved myocardial function: A systematic review.European journal of heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance in prognosticating left ventricular function in peripartum cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2025Pooled it
- Risk and Protective Factors of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current cardiology reports · 2025Pooled it
- 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure.Heart rhythm · 2023Guideline
- Efficacy and Safety of Qili Qiangxin Capsule on Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 35 Randomized Controlled Trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Blinded withdrawal of randomized treatment with low-dose digoxin or placebo in heart failure: the DECISION trial.European heart journal · 2026Trial
- Heart Failure Medication Withdrawal in Patients With Improved Cardiac Function After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The DEFINITION-AF Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Withdrawal of heart failure therapy after atrial fibrillation rhythm control with ejection fraction normalization: the WITHDRAW-AF trial.European heart journal · 2026Trial
- Finerenone in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA cardiology · 2025Trial
- Long-term follow-up of the TRED-HF trial: Implications for therapy in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure remission.European journal of heart failure · 2025Trial
- Economic Modeling Analysis of an Intensive GDMT Optimization Program in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients.Circulation. Heart failure · 2023Trial
- Dapagliflozin in heart failure with improved ejection fraction: a prespecified analysis of the DELIVER trial.Nature medicine · 2022Trial
- A qualitative exploration of participant and investigator perspectives from the TRED-HF trial.ESC heart failure · 2021Trial
- Age-stratified efficacy and safety of esaxerenone versus angiotensin II receptor blockers in older patients with hypertension: a predefined subanalysis of the ESCORT-HT study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Long-term outcome of heart failure patients with improved ejection fraction: Results from a real-world registry.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Recovered Ejection Fraction After Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Cure or Remission?Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE · 2026Article
- Improved Ejection Fraction in the Acute Heart Failure Setting: Cardiac Structure, Cardiac Function, or Extrinsic Factors?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Case report: decommissioning of a left ventricular assist device following reverse remodeling in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patient.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Post-viral myocarditis.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
221 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
26 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with dilated cardiomyopathy whose symptoms and cardiac function have recovered often ask whether their medications can be stopped. The safety of withdrawing treatment in this situation is unknown.
methodsWe did an open-label, pilot, randomised trial to examine the effect of phased withdrawal of heart failure medications in patients with previous dilated cardiomyopathy who were now asymptomatic, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved from less than 40% to 50% or greater, whose left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) had normalised, and who had an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) concentration less than 250 ng/L. Patients were recruited from a network of hospitals in the UK, assessed at one centre (Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), and randomly assigned (1:1) to phased withdrawal or continuation of treatment. After 6 months, patients in the continued treatment group had treatment withdrawn by the same method. The primary endpoint was a relapse of dilated cardiomyopathy within 6 months, defined by a reduction in LVEF of more than 10% and to less than 50%, an increase in LVEDV by more than 10% and to higher than the normal range, a two-fold rise in NT-pro-BNP concentration and to more than 400 ng/L, or clinical evidence of heart failure, at which point treatments were re-established. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02859311.
findingsBetween April 21, 2016, and Aug 22, 2017, 51 patients were enrolled. 25 were randomly assigned to the treatment withdrawal group and 26 to continue treatment. Over the first 6 months, 11 (44%) patients randomly assigned to treatment withdrawal met the primary endpoint of relapse compared with none of those assigned to continue treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 45·7% [95% CI 28·5-67·2]; p=0·0001). After 6 months, 25 (96%) of 26 patients assigned initially to continue treatment attempted its withdrawal. During the following 6 months, nine patients met the primary endpoint of relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 36·0% [95% CI 20·6-57·8]). No deaths were reported in either group and three serious adverse events were reported in the treatment withdrawal group: hospital admissions for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure.
interpretationMany patients deemed to have recovered from dilated cardiomyopathy will relapse following treatment withdrawal. Until robust predictors of relapse are defined, treatment should continue indefinitely.
fundingBritish Heart Foundation, Alexander Jansons Foundation, Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.