ReviewPublic health nutrition2019
Dietary assessment toolkits: an overview.
Review in Public health nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Completion Rates of Food Frequency Questionnaires and Food Records in People with Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of ultra-processed foods consumption on the burden of obesity and type 2 diabetes in Belgium: a comparative risk assessment.BMC public health · 2025Pooled it
- Essential dataset features in a successful obesity registry: a systematic review.International health · 2025Pooled it
- Characterizing Dietary Intakes in Rural Australian Adults: A Systematic Literature Review.Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
- OBEDIS Core Variables Project: European Expert Guidelines on a Minimal Core Set of Variables to Include in Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trials of Obesity Interventions.Obesity facts · 2020Guideline
- Trial
- Adolescent sleep restriction, macronutrient consumption, and self-reported hunger: A randomized clinical trial.Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Trial
- Synergistic Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training andInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Trial
- Plasma carotenoids and skin carotenoid status response following short-term changes in carotenoid intakes: a randomised clinical trial.European journal of nutrition · 2025Trial
- Two a Priori Dietary Indices among Young Children in the Children's Healthy Living (CHL) Trial: Validation and Association with Health Outcomes.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- The Association Between Acculturation and Diet and Physical Activity Among Pregnant Hispanic Women with Abnormal Glucose Tolerance.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Bimagrumab vs Optimized Standard of Care for Treatment of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2020Trial
- Exposure misclassification of self-reported vegetarian diet and its impact on health outcomes.International journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Is carbohydrate, protein, fat, and energy intake adequate among lactating women in Northwest Ethiopia?Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2026Article
- Modernization of Nutritional Assessment in Population Surveys: Integrating Anthropometry, Body Composition, and Biomarkers in the Digital Era.Current nutrition reports · 2026Review
- Prevalence of acute malnutrition and associated factors among children in schools with and without feeding programs: a comparative cross sectional study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Dietary intervention among young cancer survivors within the CARE for CAYA program.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA wide variety of methods are available to assess dietary intake, each one with different strengths and weaknesses. Researchers face multiple challenges when diet and nutrition need to be accurately assessed, particularly in the selection of the most appropriate dietary assessment method for their study. The goal of the current collaborative work is to present a collection of available resources for dietary assessment implementation.Design/Setting/ParticipantsAs a follow-up to the 9th International Conference on Diet and Physical Activity Methods held in 2015, developers of dietary assessment toolkits agreed to collaborate in the preparation of the present paper, which provides an overview of each toolkit. The toolkits presented include: the Diet, Anthropometry and Physical Activity Measurement Toolkit (DAPA; UK); the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Dietary Assessment Primer (USA); the Nutritools website (UK); the Australasian Child and Adolescent Obesity Research Network (ACAORN) method selector (Australia); and the Danone Dietary Assessment Toolkit (DanoneDAT; France). An at-a-glance summary of features and comparison of the toolkits is provided.
resultsThe present review contains general background on dietary assessment, along with a summary of each of the included toolkits, a feature comparison table and direct links to each toolkit, all of which are freely available online.
conclusionsThis overview of dietary assessment toolkits provides comprehensive information to aid users in the selection and implementation of the most appropriate dietary assessment method, or combination of methods, with the goal of collecting the highest-quality dietary data possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.