Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30428906›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2018

Systematic review of incretin therapy during peri-operative and intensive care.

Abraham H Hulst, Mark P Plummer, Markus W Hollmann, J Hans DeVries, Benedikt Preckel, Adam M Deane, Jeroen Hermanides

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Hospital diabetes management (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Diabetes Management Strategies in Intensive Care Settings.The Medical clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Neuroprotective effect of engineeredBioengineering & translational medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Abraham H HulstDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mark P PlummerIntensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia.
Markus W HollmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J Hans DeVriesDepartment of Endocrinology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Benedikt PreckelDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. b.preckel@amc.uva.nl.
Adam M DeaneIntensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, 3050, Australia.
Jeroen HermanidesDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Postbus 22660, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) are incretin hormones. By lowering blood glucose in a glucose-dependent manner, incretin-based therapies represent a novel and promising intervention to treat hyperglycaemia in hospital settings. We performed a systematic review of the literature for all current applications of incretin-based therapies in the peri-operative and critical care settings.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for all randomised controlled trials using exogenous GLP-1, GLP-1 receptor agonists, exogenous GIP and dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors in the setting of adult peri-operative care or intensive care. We defined no comparator treatment. Outcomes of interest included blood glucose, frequency of hypoglycaemia and insulin administration.

resultsOf the 1190 articles identified during the initial literature search, 38 fulfilled criteria for full-text review, and 19 single-centre studies were subsequently included in the qualitative review. Of the 18 studies reporting glycaemic control, improvement was reported in 15, defined as lower glucose concentrations in 12 and as reduced insulin administration (with similar glucose concentrations) in 3. Owing to heterogeneity, meta-analysis was possible only for the outcome of hypoglycaemia. This revealed an incidence of 7.4% in those receiving incretin-based therapies and 6.8% in comparator groups (P = 0.94).

conclusionsIn small, single-centre studies, incretin-based therapies lowered blood glucose and reduced insulin administration without increasing the incidence of hypoglycaemia.

trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42017071926.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseCritical CareHumansHypoglycemic AgentsIncretinsInsulinIntensive Care UnitsPerioperative CareBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsIncretinsInsulinDPP-IV inhibitorsGIPGLP-1Glucose controlHyperglycaemiaHypoglycaemiaIntensive carePeri-operative care

Identifiers

PMID30428906
PMCPMC6236901
OpenAlexW2901573615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.