Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30428896›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2018

Kinect-based assessment of proximal arm non-use after a stroke.

K K A Bakhti, I Laffont, M Muthalib, J Froger, D Mottet

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02326688 nacompletednot on this map

Reliability of Kinematic Analysis in Assessment and Rehabilitation of the Upper Arm of Stroke Patients Following a Cerebral Vascular Accident, Hemiparetic Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2014 to 2018Enrolled144ConditionsHemiplegiaArmsKinematic analysis of trunk compensation
NCT04291573 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Recovering Arm Function in Chronic Post-stroke Patients Using Combined HD-tDCS and Virtual Reality Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2021 to 2025Enrolled58ConditionsChronic Post Stroke IndividualsArmsHD-tDCS, Sham HD-tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Follow control of upper limb rehabilitation training based on Kinect and NAO robot].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K K A BakhtiEuromov, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. k-bakhti@chu-montpellier.fr.
I LaffontEuromov, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
M MuthalibEuromov, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
J FrogerEuromov, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
D MottetEuromov, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRUniversité de Nîmes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter a stroke, during seated reaching with their paretic upper limb, many patients spontaneously replace the use of their arm by trunk compensation movements, even though they are able to use their arm when forced to do so. We previously quantified this proximal arm non-use (PANU) with a motion capture system (Zebris, CMS20s). The aim of this study was to validate a low-cost Microsoft Kinect-based system against the CMS20s reference system to diagnose PANU.

methodsIn 19 hemiparetic stroke individuals, the PANU score, reach length, trunk length, and proximal arm use (PAU) were measured during seated reaching simultaneously by the Kinect (v2) and the CMS20s over two testing sessions separated by two hours.

resultsIntraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and linear regression analysis showed that the PANU score (ICC = 0.96, r

conclusionWe showed that the Kinect could accurately and reliably assess PANU, reach length, trunk length and PAU during seated reaching in post stroke individuals. We conclude that the Kinect can offer a low-cost and widely available solution to clinically assess PANU for individualised rehabilitation and to monitor the progress of paretic arm recovery.

trial registrationThe study was approved by The Ethics Committee of Montpellier, France (N°ID-RCB: 2014-A00395-42) and registered in Clinical Trial (N° NCT02326688, Registered on 15 December 2014, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT02326688 ).

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsStrokeUltrasonographyUpper ExtremityArm non-useKinect v2Movement analysisRehabilitationStroke

Identifiers

PMID30428896
PMCPMC6236999
OpenAlexW2901191116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.