Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30428885›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

The usefulness of small-area-based socioeconomic characteristics in assessing the treatment outcomes of type 2 diabetes patients: a register-based mixed-effect study.

Maija Toivakka, Aki Pihlapuro, Markku Tykkyläinen, Lauri Mehtätalo, Tiina Laatikainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maija ToivakkaDepartment of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland. maija.toivakka@uef.fi.
Aki PihlapuroJoint municipal authority for North Karelia social and health services (Siun sote), Tikkamäentie 16, FI-80210, Joensuu, Finland.
Markku TykkyläinenDepartment of Geographical and Historical Studies, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland.
Lauri MehtätaloSchool of Computing, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101, Joensuu, Finland.
Tiina LaatikainenJoint municipal authority for North Karelia social and health services (Siun sote), Tikkamäentie 16, FI-80210, Joensuu, Finland.

Funding

Strategic Research Council Consortium:312703, WP4:312704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of the differences in the outcomes of care by socioeconomic status (SES) is beneficial for both the efficient targeting of health care services and to decrease health inequalities. This study compares the effects of three patient-based SES predictors (earned income, educational attainment, employment status) with three small-area-based SES predictors (median income, educational attainment, proportion of the unemployed) on the treatment outcomes of type 2 diabetes patients.

methodsMixed-effect modeling was applied to analyse how SES factors affect the treatment outcomes of type 2 diabetes patients. The treatment outcomes were assessed by the patients' latest available glycated hemoglobin A

resultsThe effects of attained education on the treatment outcomes, both at the patient-level and the small-area-level are quite similar. Age and male gender were associated with higher HbA1c values and lower education indicated higher HbA1c values. Unemployment was not associated with HbA1c values at either the patient-level or the area-level. Income gave divergent results: high values of HbA1c were associated with low patient incomes but the median income of the postal code area did not predict the treatment outcomes of patients.

conclusionsOur comparative study of three SES factors shows that the effects of attained education on the treatment outcomes are rather similar, regardless of whether patient-based or small-area-based predictors are used. Small-area-based SES variables can be a good way to overcome the absence of individual SES information, but further research is needed to find the valid small-area factors by disease. This possibility of using more small-area-based data would be valuable in health service research and first-hand planning of health care services.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesSocial ClassAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Electronic Health RecordsFemaleFinlandGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSmall-Area AnalysisGlycated HemoglobinCare outcomesElectronic health recordsIndividual-level socioeconomic statusSmall-area-based socioeconomic statusType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID30428885
PMCPMC6236994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.