ArticleBMC medical research methodology2018
Are we on the cusp of a fourth research paradigm? Predicting the future for a new approach to methods-use in medical and health services research.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ten simple rules for training by researchers for researchers in a rapidly evolving workforce.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Learning health systems to implement chronic disease prevention programs: A novel framework and perspectives from an Australian health service.Learning health systems · 2024Article
- The European Health Data Space: are we prepared?European radiology · 2024Article
- Automatic Extraction of Research Themes in Epidemiological Criminology From PubMed Abstracts From 1946 to 2020: Text Mining Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Quick and dirty or rapid and informative? Exploring a participatory method to facilitate implementation research and organizational change.Journal of health organization and management · 2021Article
- Turbulence health systems: engineering a rapidly adaptive health system for times of crisis.BMJ health & care informatics · 2021Article
- Development of an implementation and evaluation strategy for the Australian 'Zero Childhood Cancer' (Zero) Program: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2020Article
- The rise of rapid implementation: a worked example of solving an existing problem with a new method by combining concept analysis with a systematic integrative review.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- A mobile methods pilot study of surgical spaces: 'fit for purpose? Organisational productivity and workforce wellbeing in workspaces in hospital' (FLOURISH).BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Implementation science in health & the proverbial slip between the cup & the lips.The Indian journal of medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe dominant medical and health research paradigm continues to be quantitative. While the authors sense a sea-change in opinion about mixed-method research, underpinned by two decades of highly-cited publications in medical journals, much of the medical literature still widely favours the Randomised Control Trial. MAIN BODY: This debate article examines whether it is the beginning of the end of the dominant quantitative paradigm and the interest this holds for researchers and clinicians at the forefront of care delivery. It examines the Third Research Paradigm, signifying the importance of mixed-methods, and discusses the power of the patient voice and person-focused research activity. The authors discern the coming of age of a Fourth Research Paradigm integrating mixed-methods with data collected 'on the hoof'. Within this new paradigm, the article explores the power of available, real time, and emergent data - from smart phones, wearable devices, and social media, as well as more creative approaches to data collection. The Fourth Research Paradigm will require the support of multi-disciplinary teams, moving through the world alongside their research subjects. The impact of a Fourth Research Paradigm on the health researcher is assessed, as the researcher's gaze moves away from considerations of methodological superiority to re-considerations of their role in the brave new world of research multiplicity.
conclusionThe Fourth Research Paradigm offers extensive opportunities to tell more complete research stories in real-time settings. It concentrates on contextual notions of everyday happenings within the ever-changing world of healthcare delivery. There will be challenges ahead, not least the management of large, complex datasets and adaptive study designs. But rigorous planning will enable unique insights into the relationships played out in the world of the patient and healthcare provider. Better care and new delivery models are likely to result, but how this will manifest is not yet clear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.