Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30428520›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Understanding #WorldEnvironmentDay User Opinions in Twitter: A Topic-Based Sentiment Analysis Approach.

Ana Reyes-Menendez, José Ramón Saura, Cesar Alvarez-Alonso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
42.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 173 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ecosystem Services: A Social and Semantic Network Analysis of Public Opinion on Twitter.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. How Social Media Comments Inform the Promotion of Mask-Wearing and Other COVID-19 Prevention Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Detection of Fake News Text Classification on COVID-19 Using Deep Learning Approaches.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Reyes-MenendezDepartment of Business Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, Rey Juan Carlos University, Paseo Artilleros s/n, 28032 Madrid, Spain. ana.reyes@urjc.es.ORCID 0000-0003-0636-9573
José Ramón SauraDepartment of Business Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, Rey Juan Carlos University, Paseo Artilleros s/n, 28032 Madrid, Spain. joseramon.saura@urjc.es.ORCID 0000-0002-9457-7745
Cesar Alvarez-AlonsoInstitute for Global Law and Policy, Harvard Law School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. calvarezalonso@law.harvard.edu.
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main objective of this exploratory study is to identify the social, economic, environmental and cultural factors related to the sustainable care of both environment and public health that most concern Twitter users. With 336 million active users as of 2018, Twitter is a social network that is increasingly used in research to get information and to understand public opinion as exemplified by Twitter users. In order to identify the factors related to the sustainable care of environment and public health, we have downloaded

Indexed as

EnvironmentAttitudeHumansPublic HealthPublic OpinionSocial Mediamachine learningNvivoPythonsentiment analysisSustainable Development Goalstextual analysisTwitter#WorldEnviromentDay

Identifiers

PMID30428520
PMCPMC6267440
OpenAlexW2900641211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.