Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30428322›Full record

ArticleiScience2018

Regulatory Genomic Data Cubism.

Hai Fang, Kankan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hai FangState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics and Shanghai Institute of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China; Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK. Electronic address: hfang@well.ox.ac.uk.
Kankan WangState Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics and Shanghai Institute of Hematology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China. Electronic address: kankanwang@shsmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A regularly shaped grid is useful for analyzing data particularly at multilayer levels, where patterns can be visually represented and analytically compared-conceptually similar to Picasso's cubism. Here we introduce ATLAS, featuring a suite of spatially ordered maps designed for representation and comparison of patterns seen in regulatory genomic data. It produces a landscape learned from input data and enables landscape-guided correlation with additional data. We illustrate its use for multilayer data comparison on the same cell type, and for comparisons involving different cell types, revealing information in a scientifically insightful and also visually intuitive way. The data-driven and visual-aided ability of ATLAS presents a general strategy for regulatory genomic data analysis.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCubismRegulatory Genomics

Identifiers

PMID30428322
PMCPMC6137703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.