Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30428072›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

The Many Nuanced Evolutionary Consequences of Duplicated Genes.

Ashley I Teufel, Mackenzie M Johnson, Jon M Laurent, Aashiq H Kachroo, Edward M Marcotte, Claus O Wilke

RetractedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Retention of duplicated genes in evolution.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Common CarpGenes · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ashley I TeufelDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Mackenzie M JohnsonDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Jon M LaurentInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Aashiq H KachrooInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Edward M MarcotteInstitute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
Claus O WilkeDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.

Funding

Proteomics and model organism humanization to decode human geneticsR35GM122480 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EDWARD M MARCOTTE · 2017 to 2026
$5.4M
Next-Generation Proteomics: Massively Parallel Single-Molecule Protein IdentificaDP1GM106408 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI MARCOTTE, EDWARD M · 2012 to 2016
$3.8M
The biophysical basis of translational selectionR01GM088344 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI BARRICK, JEFFREY EVAN, WILKE, CLAUS O · 2009 to 2023
$3.5M
Identifying Mutations that Promote Microbial EvolvabilityK99GM087550 · NIGMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BARRICK, JEFFREY EVAN · 2009 to 2010
$180k
National Science Foundation DBI-0939454NIGMS NIH HHS DP1 GM106408NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM087550NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088344NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication is seen as a major source of structural and functional divergence in genome evolution. Under the conventional models of sub or neofunctionalization, functional changes arise in one of the duplicates after duplication. However, we suggest here that the presence of a duplicated gene can result in functional changes to its interacting partners. We explore this hypothesis by in silico evolution of a heterodimer when one member of the interacting pair is duplicated. We examine how a range of selection pressures and protein structures leads to differential patterns of evolutionary divergence. We find that a surprising number of distinct evolutionary trajectories can be observed even in a simple three member system. Further, we observe that selection to correct dosage imbalance can affect the evolution of the initial function in several unexpected ways. For example, if a duplicate is under selective pressure to avoid binding its original binding partner, this can lead to changes in the binding interface of a nonduplicated interacting partner to exclude the duplicate. Hence, independent of the fate of the duplicate, its presence can impact how the original function operates. Additionally, we introduce a conceptual framework to describe how interacting partners cope with dosage imbalance after duplication. Contextualizing our results within this framework reveals that the evolutionary path taken by a duplicate's interacting partners is highly stochastic in nature. Consequently, the fate of duplicate genes may not only be controlled by their own ability to accumulate mutations but also by how interacting partners cope with them.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationSelection, GeneticAdaptation, BiologicalComputer SimulationModels, GeneticProtein Stability

Identifiers

PMID30428072
PMCPMC6409435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.