Observational studyJAMA surgery2019
Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis Among Privately Insured Patients.
Observational study in JAMA surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in children, why not? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2025Pooled it
- SAGES guidelines update to laparoscopy in the era of COVID-19.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Guideline
- Self-selection vs Randomized Assignment of Treatment for Appendicitis.JAMA surgery · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Post-matching analysis after coarsened exact matching: implications of coarsening for residual confounding and model dependence.Research square · 2026Article
- Examining the Efficacy of Coarsened Exact Matching as an Alternative to Propensity Score Matching.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Is propensity score matching still a valid design choice for surgical comparative effectiveness research?The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Review
- Reduced recurrence rate with a targeted approach in uncomplicated appendicitis treated with endoscopic directWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- From Bedside to Bot-Side: Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Appendicitis Management.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Association of hospital profit status with operative rates for acute appendicitis.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- Propensity Score Matching: should we use it in designing observational studies?BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting perforation in the early 24 h of acute appendicitis.SAGE open medicine · 2025Article
- Interhospital variation in the non-operative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in adults.Surgery open science · 2024Article
- CT of appendicoliths in adult appendicitis: clinical significance and characteristics of overlooked cases.European radiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Self-Locking Polymeric Clips Are Safe for the Closure of Appendiceal Stump in Laparoscopic Appendectomy.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Prevalence of appendicolith in children with acute appendicitis and its correlation with disease severity.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2023Article
- The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease - 19 Pandemic on the Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Adult Patients with Acute Appendicitis.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Safe and Definitive Solution for Suspected Appendicitis.Visceral medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Health care professionals have shown significant interest in nonoperative management for uncomplicated appendicitis, but long-term population-level data are lacking. Objective: To compare the outcomes of nonoperatively managed appendicitis against appendectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This national retrospective cohort study used claims data from a private insurance database to compare patients admitted with uncomplicated appendicitis from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2014, undergoing appendectomy vs nonoperative management. Coarsened exact matching was applied before multivariate analysis to reduce imbalance between groups. Data were analyzed from February 12 through May 1, 2018. Exposures: Appendectomy (control arm) or nonoperative management (treatment arm). Main Outcomes and Measures: Short-term primary clinical outcomes included emergency department visits, hospital readmission, abdominal abscess, and Clostridium difficile infections. Long-term primary clinical outcomes were small-bowel obstructions, incisional hernias, and appendiceal cancers. Nonoperative management failure was defined by hospital readmission with appendicitis diagnosis and an appendicitis-associated operation or procedure. Secondary outcomes included number of follow-up visits, length and cost of index hospitalization, and total cost of appendicitis-associated care. Covariates included age, sex, region, insurance plan type, admission year, and Charlson comorbidity index. Results: Of 58 329 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis (52.7% men; mean [SD] age, 31.9 [16.5] years), 55 709 (95.5%) underwent appendectomy and 2620 (4.5%) underwent nonoperative management. Patients in the nonoperative management group were more likely to have appendicitis-associated readmissions (adjusted odds ratio, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.63-2.77; P < .001) and to develop an abscess (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.92; P = .02). Patients in the nonoperative management group required more follow-up visits in the year after index admission (unadjusted mean [SD], 1.6 [6.3] vs 0.3 [1.4] visits; adjusted +1.11 visits; P < .001) and had lower index hospitalization cost (unadjusted mean [SD], $11 502 [$9287] vs $13 551 [$10 160]; adjusted -$2117, P < .001), but total cost of appendicitis care was higher when follow-up care was considered (unadjusted, $14 934 [$31 122] vs $14 186 [$10 889]; adjusted +$785; P = .003). During a mean (SD) of 3.2 (1.7) years of follow-up, failure of nonoperative management occurred in 101 patients (3.9%); median time to recurrence was 42 days (interquartile range, 8-125 days). Among the patients who experienced treatment failure, 44 did so within 30 days. Conclusions and Relevance: According to results of this study, nonoperative management failure rates were lower than previously reported. Nonoperative management was associated with higher rates of abscess, readmission, and higher overall cost of care. These data suggest that nonoperative management may not be the preferred first-line therapy for all patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.