Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30427977›Full record

SynthesisJAMA dermatology2019

Benefits and Harms of Omalizumab Treatment in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Chronic Idiopathic (Spontaneous) Urticaria: A Meta-analysis of "Real-world" Evidence.

Michael D Tharp, Jonathan A Bernstein, Abhishek Kavati, Benjamin Ortiz, Karen MacDonald, Kris Denhaerynck, Ivo Abraham, Christopher S Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative efficacy and safety of the treatment by Omalizumab for chronic idiopathic urticaria in the general population: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. [Advances in targeted therapies for chronic spontaneous urticaria].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Towards Personalised Therapy in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Advancing From Endotype to Clinical Response.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Type 2 Inflammation and Its Role in Dermatologic Diseases.International journal of dermatology · 2025
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael D TharpDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Jonathan A BernsteinDivision of Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Abhishek KavatiUS Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Benjamin OrtizRespiratory Medical Unit, US Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
Karen MacDonaldMatrix45, Tucson, Arizona.
Kris DenhaerynckMatrix45, Tucson, Arizona.
Ivo AbrahamMatrix45, Tucson, Arizona.
Christopher S LeeMatrix45, Tucson, Arizona.
Matrix Research (United States) · USBoston College · USRush University Medical Center · USTris Pharma (United States) · USUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Omalizumab is indicated for the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) (also known as chronic spontaneous urticaria) in adolescents and adults with persistent hives not controlled with antihistamines. The effectiveness of omalizumab in the real-world management of CIU is largely unknown. Objective: To quantitatively synthesize what is known about the benefits and harms of omalizumab in the real-world clinical management of CIU regarding urticaria activity, treatment response, and adverse events. Data Sources: Published observational studies (January 1, 2006, to January 1, 2018) and scientific abstracts on the effectiveness of omalizumab in CIU were identified using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane search engines; references were searched to identify additional studies. Study Selection: Included studies were observational in design and included at least 1 outcome in common with other studies and at a concurrent time point of exposure to omalizumab. A total of 67 articles (35.2% of those screened) were included in the analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines were followed; independent selection and data extraction were completed by 2 observers. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were change in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7; range, 0-42), change in Urticaria Activity Score (UAS; range 0-6) (higher score indicating worse outcome in both scales), complete and partial response rates (percentages), and adverse event rate (percentage). Results: Omalizumab therapy was associated with an improvement in UAS7 scores (-25.6 points, 95% CI, -28.2 to -23.0; P < .001; 15 studies, 294 patients), an improvement in UAS scores (-4.7 points, 95% CI, -5.0 to -4.4, P < .001; 10 studies, 1158 patients), an average complete response rate of 72.2% (95% CI, 66.1%-78.3%; P < .001; 45 studies, 1158 patients) with an additional average partial response rate of 17.8% (95% CI, 11.7%-23.9%; P < .001; 37 studies, 908 patients), and an average adverse event rate of 4.0% (95% CI, 1.0%-7.0%; P < .001; any level of severity, 47 studies, 1314 patients). Conclusions and Relevance: Benefits and safety of omalizumab in the real-world treatment of CIU meet or exceed results gleaned from clinical trials. These real-world data on omalizumab in CIU may help inform both clinical treatment expectations and policy decision making.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Allergic AgentsChronic DiseaseHumansOmalizumabRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeUrticariaAnti-Allergic AgentsOmalizumab

Identifiers

PMID30427977
PMCPMC6439579
OpenAlexW2901940756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.