ArticlePloS one2018
Optimal intensive care outcome prediction over time using machine learning.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hierarchical Poincaré analysis for anaesthesia monitoring.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Trial
- Predicting Future Organ Support Needs Using Longitudinal Emergency Department Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Research square · 2026Article
- Measuring Uncertainty to Inform Time-Limited Trials: Do We Know What We Don't Know?Critical care medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable AI for mortality prediction: a comparative study using the MIMIC-III dataset.BMJ health & care informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- An interpretable machine learning algorithm enables dynamic 48-hour mortality prediction during an ICU stay.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Dynamic Real-Time Risk Prediction Model for Intensive Care Units Patients Based on Longitudinal Irregular Data: Multicenter Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Time-Limited Trials in Intensive Care Medicine: A Tool for Avoiding Inappropriate Treatment.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Just another tool in their repertoire: uncovering insights into public and patient perspectives on clinicians' use of machine learning in perioperative care.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Prognosticating the outcome of intensive care in older patients-a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2024Review
- Review
- Real-time machine learning model to predict short-term mortality in critically ill patients: development and international validation.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- The trajectory of very old critically ill patients.Intensive care medicine · 2024Review
- Development of a deep learning model for predicting critical events in a pediatric intensive care unit.Acute and critical care · 2024Article
- Machine Learning for Benchmarking Critical Care Outcomes.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Identifying Patterns of Medical Intervention in Acute Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Observational Study.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Internet of Things and New Technologies for Tracking Perioperative Patients With an Innovative Model for Operating Room Scheduling: Protocol for a Development and Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Sepsis Prediction by Using a Hybrid Metaheuristic Algorithm: A Novel Approach for Optimizing Deep Neural Networks.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Strategies of Predictive Schemes and Clinical Diagnosis for Prognosis Using MIMIC-III: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Using machine learning on clinical data to identify unexpected patterns in groups of COVID-19 patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrognostication is an essential tool for risk adjustment and decision making in the intensive care unit (ICU). Research into prognostication in ICU has so far been limited to data from admission or the first 24 hours. Most ICU admissions last longer than this, decisions are made throughout an admission, and some admissions are explicitly intended as time-limited prognostic trials. Despite this, temporal changes in prognostic ability during ICU admission has received little attention to date. Current predictive models, in the form of prognostic clinical tools, are typically derived from linear models and do not explicitly handle incremental information from trends. Machine learning (ML) allows predictive models to be developed which use non-linear predictors and complex interactions between variables, thus allowing incorporation of trends in measured variables over time; this has made it possible to investigate prognosis throughout an admission. METHODS AND
findingsThis study uses ML to assess the predictability of ICU mortality as a function of time. Logistic regression against physiological data alone outperformed APACHE-II and demonstrated several important interactions including between lactate & noradrenaline dose, between lactate & MAP, and between age & MAP consistent with the current sepsis definitions. ML models consistently outperformed logistic regression with Deep Learning giving the best results. Predictive power was maximal on the second day and was further improved by incorporating trend data. Using a limited range of physiological and demographic variables, the best machine learning model on the first day showed an area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.883 (σ = 0.008), compared to 0.846 (σ = 0.010) for a logistic regression from the same predictors and 0.836 (σ = 0.007) for a logistic regression based on the APACHE-II score. Adding information gathered on the second day of admission improved the maximum AUC to 0.895 (σ = 0.008). Beyond the second day, predictive ability declined.
conclusionThis has implications for decision making in intensive care and provides a justification for time-limited trials of ICU therapy; the assessment of prognosis over more than one day may be a valuable strategy as new information on the second day helps to differentiate outcomes. New ML models based on trend data beyond the first day could greatly improve upon current risk stratification tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.