Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30427773›Full record

ArticleBehavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.)

Predicting Colonoscopy Screening Behavior and Future Screening Intentions for African Americans Older than 50 Years.

Lynne B Klasko-Foster, Lina M Jandorf, Deborah O Erwin, Marc T Kiviniemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lynne B Klasko-Fostera Department of Community Health and Health Behavior, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo , SUNY, Buffalo , NY , USA.
Lina M Jandorfb Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai , New York , NY , USA.
Deborah O Erwinc Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Institute , Buffalo , NY , USA.
Marc T Kiviniemid Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky , Lexington , KY , USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1299-8416

Funding

CRC Screening Thoughts and Feelings: Increasing Engagement of African AmericansR01CA171935 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ERWIN, DEBORAH O, JANDORF, LINA · 2013 to 2016
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA171935
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African Americans experience a disproportionate burden of morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer, which may be due to low adherence to screening recommendations. Previous studies have found relationships between decision-making factors and screening behavior, but few have looked at both cognitive and affective factors or within a specifically African American sample. To better understand determinants that drive screening behavior, this study examines affective, cognitive, and social variables as predictors of colonoscopy in an age-eligible African American population. Participants completed surveys assessing affective associations with colonoscopy, perceived benefits and barriers, self-efficacy, knowledge, fear of colonoscopy, perceived risk, and colorectal cancer worry and fear. Regression analysis was used to model decision-making constructs as predictors of screening behavior/intentions. Affective, cognitive, and health care experience variables predicted colonoscopy completion and intentions. Provider-level factors and previous cancer screenings predicted prior screening only, but not intentions. Affective and cognitive components of perceived risk were associated with decreased likelihood of colonoscopy behavior, but increased likelihood of colonoscopy intentions. These findings suggest that colonoscopy decision making involves a complex array of both cognitive and affective determinants. This work extends our knowledge of colorectal cancer screening decision making by evaluating the effects of these multiple determinants on screening behavior in an African American sample. Future work exploring the interplay of affect and cognitions as influences on colonoscopy decision making and how health care experiences may moderate this effect is needed to develop effective intervention approaches and reduce screening disparities.

Indexed as

AgedBlack or African AmericanColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDecision MakingDiagnostic Screening ProgramsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleForecastingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedSelf Efficacyaffective associationscolonoscopyhealth decision makinghealth disparities

Identifiers

PMID30427773
PMCPMC6517076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.