ArticleClinical and translational science2019
Evaluation of Drug-Drug Interactions of Rucaparib and CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A, and P-gp Substrates in Patients With an Advanced Solid Tumor.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02740712 (A Phase 1, Open-label, Multiple-probe Drug-drug Interaction Study to Determine the Effect of Rucaparib on Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine, S-Warfarin, Omeprazole, Midazolam, and Digoxin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1, Open-label, Multiple-probe Drug-drug Interaction Study to Determine the Effect of Rucaparib on Pharmacokinetics of Caffeine, S-Warfarin, Omeprazole, Midazolam, and Digoxin in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Rivoceranib 200 mg Once Daily on the Pharmacokinetics of a Cocktail Probe Substrate of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes: A Phase I Trial in Healthy Volunteers.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Understanding Postmarketing Requirements and Commitments for CYP3A-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions: An Analysis of FDA-Approved Drugs From 2015 to 2024.Clinical and translational science · 2026Review
- Rucaparib - drug evaluation: a PARP inhibitor for the treatment of BRCA-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Bioanalytical assay for the quantification of rucaparib in rat plasma using UPLC-MS/MS: development, and validation for interaction with myricetin.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Research progress regardingZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023Article
- Combined Oral Contraceptives As Victims of Drug Interactions.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023Review
- Transporter‑mediated drug‑drug interactions involving poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase inhibitors (Review).Oncology letters · 2023Review
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of PARP Inhibitors in Oncology.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2022Review
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Rucaparib.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2022Review
- Appropriate Selection of PARP Inhibitors in Ovarian Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2022Review
- A phase 1, open-label, drug-drug interaction study of rucaparib with rosuvastatin and oral contraceptives in patients with advanced solid tumors.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2021Article
- Manage wisely: poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) treatment and adverse events.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020Review
- An Open-Label Phase 1 Study to Determine the Effect of Lenvatinib on the Pharmacokinetics of Midazolam, a CYP3A4 Substrate, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2020Article
- Real-World Delivery of Rucaparib to Patients with Ovarian Cancer: Recommendations Based on an Integrated Safety Analysis of ARIEL2 and Study 10.The oncologist · 2020Article
- Rucaparib: A Review in Ovarian Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2019Review
- Exploring and comparing adverse events between PARP inhibitors.The Lancet. Oncology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This phase I study (CO-338-044; NCT02740712), conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors, evaluated the effect of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of caffeine 200 mg, warfarin 10 mg, omeprazole 40 mg, and midazolam 2 mg (cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A substrates; dosed as a cocktail) and digoxin 0.25 mg (P-glycoprotein (P-gp) substrate; dosed separately) without rucaparib and following oral rucaparib 600 mg b.i.d. Geometric mean (GM) ratios (90% confidence interval (CI)) of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable measurement with and without rucaparib were: caffeine, 2.26 (1.93-2.65); S-warfarin, 1.49 (1.40-1.58); omeprazole, 1.55 (1.32-1.83); midazolam, 1.39 (1.14-1.68); and digoxin, 1.20 (1.12-1.29). There was limited effect on peak concentration of the substrates (GM ratios, 0.99-1.13). At steady state, rucaparib 600 mg b.i.d. moderately inhibited CYP1A2, weakly inhibited CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP3A, and marginally increased digoxin exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.