ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2018
Wear Particle-induced Priming of the NLRP3 Inflammasome Depends on Adherent Pathogen-associated Molecular Patterns and Their Cognate Toll-like Receptors: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- The immune-microbe-metal triad: a vicious cycle driving biomaterial corrosion in the oral inflammatory microenvironment.Bioactive materials · 2027Review
- Role of Macrophage TLR4 Expression in the Immunopathogenesis of Severe Aplastic Anemia.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- Influence of metallic particles and TNF on the transcriptional regulation of NLRP3 inflammasome-associated genes in human osteoblasts.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- CoNiCrMo Particles, but Not TiAlV Particles, Activate the NLRP3 Inflammasome in Periprosthetic Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Macrophages and Bone Remodeling.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023Review
- Involvement of NF-κB/NLRP3 axis in the progression of aseptic loosening of total joint arthroplasties: a review of molecular mechanisms.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2022Review
- Shared Inflammatory Pathology of Stroke and COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- The Experimental Exploration of TCM Theory "Treating the Same Disease with Different Approaches" on an Ulcerative Colitis Model.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Interleukin-4 repairs wear particle induced osteolysis by modulating macrophage polarization and bone turnover.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2021Article
- Lysosomal disruption by orthopedic wear particles induces activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and macrophage cell death by distinct mechanisms.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021Article
- Tumor necrosis factor primes and metal particles activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in human primary macrophages.Acta biomaterialia · 2020Article
- Investigation of Cytotoxicity, Oxidative Stress, and Inflammatory Responses of Tantalum Nanoparticles in THP-1-Derived Macrophages.Mediators of inflammation · 2020Article
- Diagnosis and management of implant debris-associated inflammation.Expert review of medical devices · 2020Review
- Periprosthetic Osteolysis: Mechanisms, Prevention and Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOrthopaedic wear particles activate the NLRP3 inflammasome to produce active interleukin 1β (IL1β). However, the NLRP3 inflammasome must be primed before it can be activated, and it is unknown whether wear particles induce priming. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are thought to mediate particle bioactivity. It remains controversial whether pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and/or alarmins are responsible for TLR activation by wear particles. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Does priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome by wear particles depend on adherent PAMPs? (2) Does priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome by wear particles depend on TLRs and TIRAP/Mal? (3) Does priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome by wear particles depend on cognate TLRs? (4) Does activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by wear particles depend on adherent PAMPs?
methodsImmortalized murine macrophages were stimulated by as-received titanium particles with adherent bacterial debris, endotoxin-free titanium particles, or titanium particles with adherent ultrapure lipopolysaccharide. To study priming, NLRP3 and IL1β mRNA and IL1β protein levels were assessed in wild-type, TLR4, TLR2, and TIRAP/Mal macrophages. To study activation, IL1β protein secretion was assessed in wild-type macrophages preprimed with ultrapure lipopolysaccharide.
resultsCompared with titanium particles with adherent bacterial debris, endotoxin-free titanium particles induced 86% less NLRP3 mRNA (0.05 ± 0.03 versus 0.35 ± 0.01 NLRP3/GAPDH, p < 0.001) and 91% less IL1β mRNA (0.02 ± 0.01 versus 0.22 ± 0.03 IL1β/GAPDH, p < 0.001). ProIL1β protein level was robustly increased in wild-type macrophages stimulated by particles with adherent PAMPs but was not detectably produced in macrophages stimulated by endotoxin-free particles. Adherence of ultrapure lipopolysaccharide to endotoxin-free particles reconstituted stimulation of NLRP3 and IL1β mRNA. Particles with adherent bacterial debris induced 79% less NLRP3 mRNA (0.09 ± 0.004 versus 0.43 ± 0.13 NLRP3/GAPDH, p < 0.001) and 40% less IL1β mRNA (0.09 ± 0.04 versus 0.15 ± 0.03 IL1β/GAPDH, p = 0.005) in TLR4 macrophages than in wild-type. Similarly, those particles induced 49% less NLRP3 mRNA (0.22 ± 0.10 versus 0.43 ± 0.13 NLRP3/GAPDH, p = 0.004) and 47% less IL1β mRNA (0.08 ± 0.02 versus 0.15 ± 0.03 IL1β/GAPDH, p = 0.012) in TIRAP/Mal macrophages than in wild-type. Particles with adherent ultrapure lipopolysaccharide induced 96% less NLRP3 mRNA (0.012 ± 0.001 versus 0.27 ± 0.05 NLRP3/GAPDH, p = 0.003) and 91% less IL1β mRNA (0.03 ± 0.01 versus 0.34 ± 0.07 IL1β/GAPDH, p < 0.001) expression in TLR4 macrophages than in wild-type. In contrast, those particles did not induce less NLRP3 and IL1β mRNA in TLR2 macrophages. IL1β protein secretion was equivalently induced by particles with adherent bacterial debris or by endotoxin-free particles in a time-dependent manner in wild-type macrophages. For example, particles with adherent bacterial debris induced 99% ± 2% of maximal IL1β secretion after 12 hours, whereas endotoxin-free particles induced 92% ± 11% (p > 0.5).
conclusionsThis cell culture study showed that adherent PAMPs are required for priming of the NLRP3 inflammasome by wear particles and this process is dependent on their cognate TLRs and TIRAP/Mal. In contrast, activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by titanium particles is not dependent on adherent PAMPs. Animal and implant retrieval studies are needed to determine whether wear particles have similar effects on the NLRP3 inflammasome in vivo. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings, together with recent findings that aseptic loosening associates with polymorphisms in the TIRAP/Mal locus, support that adherent PAMPs may contribute to aseptic loosening in patients undergoing arthroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.