Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30427100›Full record

SynthesisHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2019

Measurement of joint health in persons with haemophilia: A systematic review of the measurement properties of haemophilia-specific instruments.

Samantha C Gouw, Merel A Timmer, Alok Srivastava, Piet de Kleijn, Pamela Hilliard, Marjolein Peters, Victor Blanchette, Kathelijn Fischer

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Surgery for chronic arthropathy in people with haemophilia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The haemophilia joint health score for the assessment of joint health in patients with haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physical activity, physical fitness and cardiometabolic risk amongst adults with moderate and severe haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Samantha C GouwDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merel A TimmerVan Creveldkliniek, Department of Hematology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alok SrivastavaDepartment of Hematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Piet de KleijnVan Creveldkliniek, Department of Hematology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Pamela HilliardDepartment of Rehabilitation, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Marjolein PetersDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Victor BlanchetteDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kathelijn FischerVan Creveldkliniek, Department of Hematology, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLChristian Medical College & Hospital · INHospital for Sick Children · CASickKids Foundation · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAccurate assessment of joint health in persons with haemophilia is crucial. Several haemophilia-specific measurement tools are available, but an overview of the measurement properties is lacking.

aimTo provide an overview of the measurement properties of haemophilia-specific measurement tools to assess clinical joint health.

methodsMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for reports on reliability, validity or responsiveness of the World Federation of Haemophilia Orthopedic Joint Score (WFH), Colorado Physical Examination Score (CPE), joint examination score by Petrini (PJS) and Hemophilia Joint Health Score (HJHS). Methodological quality of the studies was assessed using an adapted COSMIN checklist.

resultsThe search yielded 2905 unique hits, and 98 papers were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was limited. The HJHS was studied most extensively, which yielded limited evidence for good internal consistency and structural validity, moderate evidence for hypothesis testing in adults and conflicting evidence for hypothesis testing in children. Reliability, measurement error and responsiveness were rated unknown due to low COSMIN scores. For the CPE and PJS, we found limited to moderate evidence for good responsiveness and conflicting evidence for hypothesis testing.

conclusionOnly patchy evidence is available on the quality of measurement properties of all haemophilia-specific joint health scores. Although significant gaps in the evidence for all instruments remain, measurement properties of the HJHS were most extensively studied and show no drawbacks for use in clinical practice. This review forms the basis for further research aimed at the assessment of measurement properties of measurement tools to assess joint health.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualHemophilia AHumansJoint DiseasesJointsPhysical ExaminationQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness Indexarthropathyhaemophiliareliabilityresponsivenessvalidity

Identifiers

PMID30427100
PMCPMC7379965
OpenAlexW2900538141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.