ArticleJournal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses
The Children's Oncology Group: Organizational Structure, Membership, and Institutional Characteristics.
Article in Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology Nurses. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Childhood Cancer Data Initiative Participant Index: Mapping Pediatric Cancer Data to Facilitate Cross-Study Integrated Analysis.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Article
- Building a transdisciplinary network to improve survival in children with cancer in Colombia: seeds to forests.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025Article
- Multilevel challenges to equitable inclusion of children in trials when parents use languages other than English: A qualitative report from Children's Oncology Group's Diversity and Health Disparities Committee Language Equity Working Group.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2024Article
- Clinical trial recruitment of people who speak languages other than English: a Children's Oncology Group report.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Collaborative Innovations in Childhood Cancer Therapies.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024Review
- Children's Oncology Group 2023 blueprint: Nursing discipline.Pediatric blood & cancer · 2023Article
- Clinical and demographic factors contributing to asparaginase-associated toxicities in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2022Article
- Mapping Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial Collaborative Groups on the Global Stage.JCO global oncology · 2022Review
- Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations.Paediatric drugs · 2021Review
- Transforming Performance of Clinical Trials in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Consortium Model.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2020Article
- A Quality Approach to Blinatumomab Delivery in Pediatric Oncology: A Children's Oncology Group Study.Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology nursingArticle
- Consensus Recommendations From the Children's Oncology Group Nursing Discipline's State of the Science Symposium: Symptom Assessment During Childhood Cancer Treatment.Journal of pediatric oncology nursing : official journal of the Association of Pediatric Oncology NursesReview
- Delivery of Care for Pediatric Patients Receiving Blinatumomab: A Children's Oncology Group Study.Cancer nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Children's Oncology Group (COG) is the only organization within the National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network dedicated exclusively to pediatric cancer research. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of COG's organizational structure, to characterize its institutional and individual membership, and to summarize enrollments onto COG clinical trials.
methodData from 2013 to 2015 were compiled from sources internal (Network Operations, Statistics and Data Center, Chair's Office) and external (American Hospital Association, American Nurses Credentialing Center) to COG, to present a comprehensive overview of COG's structure, individual and institutional membership, and group operations.
resultsIn 2016, COG comprised 8,785 individuals from 223 member institutions, across seven countries. An average of 9,661 new patients were registered with COG per year over the most recent (2013-2015) 3-year period. Over the same 3-year time frame, there were an average of 16,836 enrollments onto therapeutic (i.e., treatment) and nontherapeutic (e.g., epidemiology, survivorship, biology) trials per year.
conclusionsCOG institutions have diverse characteristics related to size, geographical location, and infrastructure. Individual membership also reflects diversity with representation from over 28 disciplines and groups. The diversity of COG institutions and individual members allows for unique perspectives and contributions to science unified under a common goal to enroll children/adolescents onto clinical trials. COG's collaborative, multidisciplinary approach to science functions to support the development of research that seeks to continually improve outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.