Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426557›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of health planning and management2019

Health care purchasing in Kenya: Experiences of health care providers with capitation and fee-for-service provider payment mechanisms.

Melvin Obadha, Jane Chuma, Jacob Kazungu, Edwine Barasa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of health planning and management, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melvin ObadhaHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-2410
Jane ChumaHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Jacob KazunguHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3138-7274
Edwine BarasaHealth Economics Research Unit, KEMRI|Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5793-7177

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 101082Wellcome Trust 107527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProvider payment mechanisms (PPMs) play a critical role in universal health coverage due to the incentives they create for health care providers to deliver needed services, quality, and efficiency. We set out to explore public, private, and faith-based providers' experiences with capitation and fee-for-service in Kenya and identified attributes of PPMs that providers considered important.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study in two counties in Kenya. Data were collected using semistructured interviews with 29 management team members in six health providers accredited by the National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF).

resultsCapitation and fee-for-service payments from the NHIF and private insurers were reported as good revenue sources as they contributed to providers' overall income. The expected fee-for-service payment amounts from NHIF and private insurers were predictable while capitation funds from NHIF were not because providers did not have information on the number of enrolees in their capitation pool. Moreover, capitation payment rates were perceived as inadequate. Capitation and fee-for-service payments from NHIF and private insurers were disbursed late. Finally, public providers had lost their autonomy to access and utilise capitation and fee-for-service payments from the NHIF.

conclusionThrough their experiences, health care providers revealed characteristics of PPMs that they considered important.

Indexed as

Capitation FeeFee-for-Service PlansHealth PersonnelReimbursement MechanismsCross-Sectional StudiesHealth ExpendituresHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInsurance, HospitalizationInterviews as TopicKenyaQualitative ResearchUniversal Health InsuranceAttributescapitationfee-for-serviceKenyaprovider payment mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID30426557
PMCPMC6559267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.