Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426503›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2019

Identification and validation of DOCK4 as a potential biomarker for risk of bone metastasis development in patients with early breast cancer.

Jules A Westbrook, Steven L Wood, David A Cairns, Kathryn McMahon, Renu Gahlaut, Helene Thygesen, Mike Shires, Stephanie Roberts, Helen Marshall, Maria R Oliva and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Organ-Specificity of Breast Cancer Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jules A WestbrookDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Steven L WoodDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
David A CairnsClinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Kathryn McMahonLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Renu GahlautLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Helene ThygesenLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Mike ShiresLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Stephanie RobertsClinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Helen MarshallClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Maria R OlivaDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Mark J DunningSheffield Institute of Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Andrew M HanbyLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Peter J SelbyClinical and Biomedical Proteomics Group, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Valerie SpeirsLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0602-4666
Georgia MavriaLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Robert E ColemanDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Janet E BrownDepartment of Oncology and Metabolism, Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4960-3032
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-0707-10101Medical Research Council G0802416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skeletal metastasis occurs in around 75% of advanced breast cancers, with the disease incurable once cancer cells disseminate to bone, but there remains an unmet need for biomarkers to identify patients at high risk of bone recurrence. This study aimed to identify such a biomarker and to assess its utility in predicting response to adjuvant zoledronic acid (zoledronate). We used quantitative proteomics (stable isotope labelling by amino acids in cell culture-mass spectrometry; SILAC-MS) to compare protein expression in a bone-homing variant (BM1) of the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 with parental non-bone-homing cells to identify novel biomarkers for risk of subsequent bone metastasis in early breast cancer. SILAC-MS showed that dedicator of cytokinesis protein 4 (DOCK4) was upregulated in bone-homing BM1 cells, confirmed by western blotting. BM1 cells also had enhanced invasive ability compared with parental cells, which could be reduced by DOCK4-shRNA. In a training tissue microarray (TMA) comprising 345 patients with early breast cancer, immunohistochemistry followed by Cox regression revealed that high DOCK4 expression correlated with histological grade (p = 0.004) but not oestrogen receptor status (p = 0.19) or lymph node involvement (p = 0.15). A clinical validation TMA used tissue samples and the clinical database from the large AZURE adjuvant study (n = 689). Adjusted Cox regression analyses showed that high DOCK4 expression in the control arm (no zoledronate) was significantly prognostic for first recurrence in bone (HR 2.13, 95%CI 1.06-4.30, p = 0.034). No corresponding association was found in patients who received zoledronate (HR 0.812, 95%CI 0.176-3.76, p = 0.790), suggesting that treatment with zoledronate may counteract the higher risk for bone relapse from high DOCK4-expressing tumours. High DOCK4 expression was not associated with metastasis to non-skeletal sites when these were assessed collectively. In conclusion, high DOCK4 in early breast cancer is significantly associated with aggressive disease and with future bone metastasis and is a potentially useful biomarker for subsequent bone metastasis risk. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleGene Knockdown TechniquesGTPase-Activating ProteinsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingBiomarkers, TumorBone Density Conservation AgentsDOCK4 protein, humanGTPase-Activating ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsZoledronic Acidbiomarkerbone metastasisbreast cancerDOCK4proteomics

Identifiers

PMID30426503
PMCPMC6618075
OpenAlexW2900926148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.