ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2019
Robotic-assisted ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease: outcomes from an early national experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Standardisation in robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The outcomes of robotic ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Pooled it
- Robotic ambulatory colorectal resections: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of early bowel resection versus initial medical therapy in patient's with ileocolonic Crohn's disease.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Pooled it
- An analysis of feasibility of robotic colectomy: post hoc analysis of a phase III randomised controlled trial.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Trial
- Article
- Endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease following laparoscopic versus robotic ileocolic resection.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Comparative anastomotic configurations and disease recurrence rates of robotic vs. laparoscopic primary ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2024 for the Clinical Practice of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Intestinal Neoplasia (English Version).Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2026Review
- Early Experience With Robotic Approaches to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery: A Single-Center Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- A Case of Ascending Colon Cancer Complicated by Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome Treated with Robot-Assisted Right Hemicolectomy.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Review
- Implementation of a robotic surgical practice in inflammatory bowel disease.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Incisional hernia rates between intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Article
- The Revival of Surgery in Crohn's Disease-Early Intestinal Resection as a Reasonable Alternative in Localized Ileitis.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Robotic and laparoscopic surgical techniques in patients with Crohn's disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- [Minimally invasive and robot-assisted surgery for chronic inflammatory bowel disease : Current status and evidence situation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
- Morbidly Obese Patients with Ileocolic Crohn's Disease May Benefit from Robotic Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crohn's disease is an incurable inflammatory disorder that can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract. While medical management is considered first-line treatment, approximately 70-90% of patients with Crohn's disease will require at least one surgical intervention during the course of their lifetimes. Traditionally, abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease has been performed via an open approach with an increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare postoperative outcomes from an initial national experience with robotic-assisted ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Patients who underwent elective ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease by robotic-assisted or open approaches from 2011 to Q3 2015 were identified using ICD-9 codes from the Premier Healthcare Database. Propensity-score matching (1:1) was performed using age, gender, race, Charlson index score, and year of surgery to form comparable cohorts in order to compare the robotic-assisted and open groups. 3641 patients underwent elective ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease during the study period (1910 [52.5%] open and 109 [3%] robotic-assisted). Post-matched comparison of cohorts (n = 108 per cohort) showed that robotic-assisted cases were longer by a mean of 60 min (p < 0.0001), had shorter length of hospital stay by a median of 2 days (p < 0.001) and a lower 30-day complication rate (24% vs. 38%; p = 0.039). This national database assessment of patients undergoing elective ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease demonstrated that a robotic-assisted approach was associated with longer operative times, shorter length of hospital stay and lower 30-day complication rates compared to open approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30426352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.