ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2019
Comparison of Three Real-Time PCR Assays for the Detection of PIK3CA Somatic Mutations in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Tissues of Patients with Breast Carcinomas.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility ofGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2026Article
- ESR1 testing on FFPE samples from metastatic lesions in HR + /HER2- breast cancer after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Article
- Analytical and Clinical Validation of Solo-Test Driver: A Targeted Amplicon-Based NGS Test-System for FFPE and cfDNA Analysis in Clinical Oncology Setting.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- The Correlation of Mutations and Expressions of Genes within the PI3K/Akt/mTOR Pathway in Breast Cancer-A Preliminary Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide. Mutations of the PIK3CA gene are found in approximately 25% of breast carcinomas and are reported as activators of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. This study aims to compare three assays for the somatic mutation detection of PIK3CA gene in FFPE tissues of patients with breast cancer. We compared Cobas® PIK3CA Mutation Test (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France), PCR amplification-refractory mutation system Scorpions® (ARMS) and High-Resolution Melting PCR assay (HRM) for the detection of PIK3CA mutations. Discrepant samples were assessed using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). 46 FFPE breast carcinomas samples of patients treated for breast cancer have been assessed for PIK3CA mutations using the three PCR assays. Among the 46 samples, 17 (37.8%), 13 (28.36%) and 19 (41.3%) had a PIK3CA mutation, with Cobas®, ARMS and HRM assays respectively. Three different mutations of PIK3CA have been detected for one sample. Calculated kappa were 0.95[0.86;1] between Cobas® and HRM, 0.75[0.55;0.95] between Cobas® and ARMS and 0.72[0.51;0.92] between HRM and ARMS. Five samples were found with discrepant results. Our study shows that the Cobas® assay is suitable for PIK3CA mutation assessment in patients with breast cancer. HRM assay is also suitable for PIK3CA mutation assessment but requires a mutation characterization with a specific assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.