Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426275›Full record

ArticleLifetime data analysis2020

Nested exposure case-control sampling: a sampling scheme to analyze rare time-dependent exposures.

Jan Feifel, Madlen Gebauer, Martin Schumacher, Jan Beyersmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lifetime data analysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jan FeifelUlm University, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 89081, Ulm, Germany. jan.feifel@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3453-9365
Madlen GebauerUlm University, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Martin SchumacherUniversity Medical Center Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Straße 26, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.
Jan BeyersmannUlm University, Helmholtzstrasse 20, 89081, Ulm, Germany.
Helmholtz-Institute Ulm · DEUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For large cohort studies with rare outcomes, the nested case-control design only requires data collection of small subsets of the individuals at risk. These are typically randomly sampled at the observed event times and a weighted, stratified analysis takes over the role of the full cohort analysis. Motivated by observational studies on the impact of hospital-acquired infection on hospital stay outcome, we are interested in situations, where not necessarily the outcome is rare, but time-dependent exposure such as the occurrence of an adverse event or disease progression is. Using the counting process formulation of general nested case-control designs, we propose three sampling schemes where not all commonly observed outcomes need to be included in the analysis. Rather, inclusion probabilities may be time-dependent and may even depend on the past sampling and exposure history. A bootstrap analysis of a full cohort data set from hospital epidemiology allows us to investigate the practical utility of the proposed sampling schemes in comparison to a full cohort analysis and a too simple application of the nested case-control design, if the outcome is not rare.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesEpidemiologic MethodsBinomial DistributionComputer SimulationCross InfectionEnvironmental ExposureHumansTime FactorsCost-effective samplingCox proportional hazards modelHospital-acquired pneumoniaMatched case-control studyTime-dependent covariate

Identifiers

PMID30426275
OpenAlexW2900483880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.