Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426245›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2018

Management of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Esophageal Cancer in the Older Population.

Dara Bracken-Clarke, Abdul Rehman Farooq, Anne M Horgan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dara Bracken-ClarkeMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Road, Waterford, X91 ER8E, Ireland.
Abdul Rehman FarooqMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Road, Waterford, X91 ER8E, Ireland.
Anne M HorganMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital Waterford, Dunmore Road, Waterford, X91 ER8E, Ireland. AnneM.Horgan@hse.ie.
University Hospital Waterford · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review aims to synthesise the current literature on the management of early-stage and metastatic esophageal cancers, focusing on the older population. In particular, we aim to dissect out the elderly-specific data from the relevant trials and to discuss the issues unique to this population. RECENT

findingsWhile surgery is the curative modality in esophageal malignancies, the CROSS, MAGIC and FLOT trials demonstrate a clear advantage to neoadjuvant therapy (chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy). These trials, however, included few elderly patients. There is a similar lack of elderly-specific data in the metastatic setting. Esophageal malignancies remain highly lethal with increasing incidence with age. Despite the relative lack of elderly-specific data, the fit older population appear to similarly benefit from multimodal therapy in early-stage and palliative therapy in metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedCombined Modality TherapyDisease ManagementEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisCancerChemotherapyElderlyOesophago-gastric junctionOesophagus

Identifiers

PMID30426245
OpenAlexW2901867790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.