Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426208›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2019

The Latin American Brain Tumor Board teleconference: results of a web-based survey to evaluate participant experience utilizing this resource.

Mohammad H Abu Arja, Joseph R Stanek, Andrés E Morales La Madrid, Alvaro Lassaletta, Ute Bartels, Ibrahim Qaddoumi, Jonathan L Finlay, Diana S Osorio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad H Abu ArjaThe Department of Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Joseph R StanekThe Department of Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Andrés E Morales La MadridThe Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Alvaro LassalettaThe Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Stem Cell Transplant Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain.
Ute BartelsThe Department of Hematology Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
Ibrahim QaddoumiGlobal Pediatric Medicine Department, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jonathan L FinlayThe Department of Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Diana S OsorioThe Department of Hematology, Oncology, Blood and Marrow Transplant, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, 700 Children's Drive, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA. Diana.Osorio@nationwidechildrens.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Latin American Brain Tumor Board (LATB) is a weekly teleconference connecting pediatric neuro-oncologists from referral centers in high-income countries with pediatric subspecialists from 20 Latin American countries since 2013. This survey explored the participants' experience utilizing this resource.

methodsA cross-sectional electronic questionnaire was distributed to 159 participants through email and Cure4Kids.

resultsNinety-five respondents (60%) from all the participating countries completed the survey. Sixty-one reported frequent-attendance (≥ 1 per month), 23 reported infrequent-attendance (< 1 per month), and 11 never participated. The most frequently reported attendance-barriers were the subspecialist's workload (64%), the timing of the teleconference (38%), and Internet connectivity problems (29%). Subspecialist's workload was more frequently reported as a barrier compared with other barriers, in both the frequent- and infrequent-attendance groups (p < 0.05), with the exception of the timing of the meeting in the infrequent-attendance group. More than 80% of attendees found the frequency and duration of the teleconference were sufficient. Utilizing Spanish as the primary language was reported to enhance the recommendations by 93% of the attendees. Moreover, 84% reported that the recommendations (almost) always fit the local circumstances. Furthermore, 99% of attendees found the teleconference provided a continuing medical education opportunity. Finally, 96% of attendees (almost) always found that the provided recommendations helped to improve the outcomes/quality of life of the patients.

conclusionsThe LATB teleconference provided a valuable tool for the management of pediatric brain tumors in Latin America as it provided a feasible and easy to access continued medical education opportunity for the participants.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsTelecommunicationsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternetLatin AmericaMedical OncologyNeurologyPediatricsRemote ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesCentral nervous system tumorsChildhood brain tumorsGlobal oncologyLower and middle income countriesNeuro-oncologyTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.