Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30426178›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2019

Failure of lumbar disc surgery: management by fusion or arthroplasty?

Vladimir Kovač

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir KovačArithera Hospital for Special Diseases, Bukovačka 1, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia. vladimir.kovac17@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6365-2028
Children's Hospital Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze and clarify conflicting aspects of fusion and total disc replacement (TDR) surgery in literature.

methodUsing keywords, 23 literature reviews, 41 studies accepted by "importance criteria" from the Internet, and 16 articles "published in 2018" were chosen. Altogether 80 studies.

resultsGeneral assessment was mentioned as affirmative for TDR in 40 papers, five were negative, 24 without clear decision. Long term results TDR seven affirmative, four nondecisive. Comparison to fusion (general, ALIF, 360

conclusionIt is concluded that problems with anterior surgery, imbursement policy, and potential problems with salvage surgery are major reasons for loosing popularity of TDR surgery.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationLumbar VertebraeSpinal FusionCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansIntervertebral DiscLumbosacral RegionMaleTotal Disc ReplacementTreatment FailureVascular System InjuriesArthroplastyFailed disc surgeryFusionsLiterature review

Identifiers

PMID30426178
OpenAlexW2900581770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.